Re: Win32 Proxy question

2000-11-13 Thread Chris Winters
* Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001114 00:42]: > I believe that you are until the model completely changes under Apache > 2.0... Until Unix Apache supports multi-threading, supporting it in windows > pre-2.0 is not quite such a high priority I suspect. > > You should consider using Act

Re: Win32 Proxy question

2000-11-13 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 02:05 PM 11/13/00 -0800, Ian Struble wrote: >You can still get alot out of a proxy if you have a win32 box doing >heavyweight mod_perl stuff. The only thing is that you need to have it >on a different machine because mod_proxy doesn't hack it on a win32 >machine. I'm sure that you could do it

Re: Win32 Proxy question

2000-11-13 Thread Ian Struble
How hard are you pounding it in the 'lab'? I don't remember how hard I had to pound to break my win32 proxy(NT4,SP4 and Apache 1.3.9 or 11) but it wasn't all that hard. You should be able to pound pretty hard with an LWP based pounder. Ian On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, siberian wrote: > Under Win 2

Re: Win32 Proxy question

2000-11-13 Thread siberian
Under Win 2k Advanced Server using mod perl and mod proxy we get ok results in 'laboratory settings'. How that will translate in the real world is anyones guess, most likely poorly. Thanks John- On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Ian Struble wrote: > You can still get alot out of a proxy if you have a win32

Re: Win32 Proxy question

2000-11-13 Thread Ian Struble
You can still get alot out of a proxy if you have a win32 box doing heavyweight mod_perl stuff. The only thing is that you need to have it on a different machine because mod_proxy doesn't hack it on a win32 machine. I'm sure that you could do it with something other that apache+mod_proxy if