md wrote:
--- md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to have row-level locking (as opposed
to table-level or null locker) with MySQL 4.x and
Apache::Session?
You effectively have that already, since the MySQL locker only locks an
individual session. Check the code.
Looks like I get that wi
--- md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to have row-level locking (as opposed
> to table-level or null locker) with MySQL 4.x and
> Apache::Session?
Looks like I get that with InnoDB automatically...
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center
--- Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you look at the actual contents of
> Apache::Session::MySQL, you'll see
> that it's essentially just a config file. There's
> no need to be
> concerned about using Flex, but you could easilly
> code up your own
> Apache::Session::MySQLNoLock
--- Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be. Frankly, there is no value to the kind
> of mutual exclusion
> that the Apache::Session locking provides in a
> typical web application.
> If you use the null locker you will still get
> atomic updates, but you
> will have the pos
md wrote:
Also, we'll soon be adding a substantial number of
users to our system and I wonder if it would be wise
to move away from the table locking that is currently
being used with Apache::Session::MySQL.
It would be. Frankly, there is no value to the kind of mutual exclusion
that the Apache::
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 11:55 AM, md wrote:
We're using Apache::Session::MySQL (Apache::Session
1.54) and occassionaly see long lock times.
I had a similar problem a few months ago with
Apache::Session::Postgres. I occasionally had Apache processes hang,
and a quick ps aux shows a st
We're using Apache::Session::MySQL (Apache::Session
1.54) and occassionaly see long lock times.
Also, we'll soon be adding a substantial number of
users to our system and I wonder if it would be wise
to move away from the table locking that is currently
being used with Apache::Session::MySQL.
I'
