grant stevens wrote:
> I think all I'm asking about is a performance comparison for a site
> comprised of 95% static content between Apache SSI and a mod_perl
> db/template system.
Well, mod_include (SSI) is the best choice if it meets your needs. A
modern OS will cache your include files
at Apache::Template and Template
Mason provides caching also.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: grant stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: figures/resources on content via apache SSI vs. database-driven
(perl DBI)
all-
Pe
all-
Perhaps I am making a mistaken assumption, but just in case I wanted to
support my assumptions with some real data.
Can anyone point me to some script resources, or maybe just the results of
their own experience on the performance of SSIs in apache vs. converting a
site to a database-dri
