n Java Webserver,
> >> How to do it in Apache Webserver.
> >>
> >> Please let the Ring know this,
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Regards,
> >> Anand
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: Derek Jones
> >> To: Hemant S
, but I don't know how to set that up.
> From: Medi Montaseri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 20:57:19 -0800 (PST)
> To: Anand R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: load balancing on apache by IP CHAINING
>
>
ow to do it in Apache Webserver.
>
> Please let the Ring know this,
> Thanks in advance,
> Regards,
> Anand
> - Original Message -
> From: Derek Jones
> To: Hemant Singh ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Derek G Jones
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 200
, December 14, 2001 7:29
PM
Subject: RE: load balancing on
apache
Hi
all,
You
can do load balancing using ipchains as well.
Can't remember the program name offhand, but if I have
time
I'll
look it up and let the list know.
Only
works if your s
"? If not,
then what criteria do you want to use?
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Lembark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: load balancing on apache
>
>
> -- Hemant Singh <[EMAIL
I think you also have to specify weather your web applications are
state-less or not. If stateless, then you can just use DNS Round Robin
technique or lbnamed (Load Balancing Name Server) to achieve this load
balancing or high availability.
If your apps are statefull as in ASP, Cold Fusion, JSP,
Jeff Beard wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > > I _really_ hate so-called dedicated boxes. They're closed, nasty,
> > > inflexible and often don't work in _your_ situation. Doing smart
> > > session-based redirection can be hard with these boxes.
> >
> > You can make it
At least one person MUST mention Backhand!
www.backhand.org
I'm working on a project right now that is expected to grow to 100+
servers in the next 12 months. In past projects I've worked on, handling
of the log files becomes non-trivial at numbers far below that, so I
built the new system to
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > I _really_ hate so-called dedicated boxes. They're closed, nasty,
> > inflexible and often don't work in _your_ situation. Doing smart
> > session-based redirection can be hard with these boxes.
>
> You can make it work with homegrown solutions, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>You can make it work with homegrown solutions, but I've found the dedicated
>load-balancing tools (at least Big/IP) to be effective and fairly easy to
>work with, even with large loads, failover requirements, and more exotic
>stuff like sticky sessions. This is one ar
> Aside from the fact I _really_ wouldn't expect that manny actual, live
> TCP connections at one time...
Nor would I, although we did see huge numbers of open connections during
peak times at eToys. Mostly to the image serving machines though.
> I _really_ hate so-called dedicated boxes. They'
> Well,
Linux Virtual Server is using ipchains (on the load balancer),
> and you can use any kind of OS
on your real servers (those running your
> application), since it's only
TCP/IP routing and/or forwarding.
Thanks
Frederic, I had only ever hand-cranked this kind
of
setup manually
You should also check out Coyote Point's Equalizer ... this a
hardware/software solution that worked well for ValueClick up to about 70
million requests per day. It's basically a FreeBSD box with a custom
dynamic natd ... supports hot-swap redundancy with two of 'em installed
... and a _lot_ che
"Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am planning to host an application and its size is going to be big one ,
> > so expect the concurrent number of connection s to be around 2200.
> > To combat the same , want to perform load sharing on 3-4 servers.
>
> If you really expect 2200 c
PROTECTED]]Envoyé : vendredi 14 décembre 2001
15:00À : Hemant Singh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc :
Derek G JonesObjet : RE: load balancing on
apache
Hi
all,
You
can do load balancing using ipchains as well.
Can't remember the program name offhand, but if I have
time
Hi
all,
You
can do load balancing using ipchains as well.
Can't
remember the program name offhand, but if I have time
I'll
look it up and let the list know.
Only
works if your servers are Linux of course.
Kind
regards
Derek.
--
d'origine-De : Hemant Singh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Envoyé : vendredi 14 décembre
2001 09:51À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet : load
balancing on apache
Hi All
I am planning to host an
application and its size is going to be big one , so expect the concurrent
number of connection
> I am planning to host an application and its size is going to be big one ,
> so expect the concurrent number of connection s to be around 2200.
> To combat the same , want to perform load sharing on 3-4 servers.
If you really expect 2200 concurrent connections, you should buy dedicated
load-bal
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Steven Lembark wrote:
> -- Hemant Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I am planning to host an application and its size is going to be big one
> > , so expect the concurrent number of connection s to be around 2200.To
> > combat the same , want to perform load sharing on 3-4 ser
-- Hemant Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi All
>
> I am planning to host an application and its size is going to be big one
> , so expect the concurrent number of connection s to be around 2200.To
> combat the same , want to perform load sharing on 3-4 servers.So the ide
> is to put one machine o
"Hemant Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> I am planning to host an application and its size is going to be big one , so
> expect the concurrent number of connection s to be around 2200.To combat the
> same , want to perform load sharing on 3-4 servers.So the ide is to put on
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Hemant Singh wrote:
> Pls suggest how can i achieve this on apache.
mod_backhand may be able to help you out here with proper "pass it on"
type load balancing. If you use it with wackamole you might not even need
the front machine.
http://www.backhand.org/
Haven't used
Hi Hemant Singh, A round-robin dns server would be easiest. There's no true load balancing this way though. Regards, John Hoffman - Original Message - From: Hemant Singh Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: load balancing on apache H
Hi All
I am planning to host an application
and its size is going to be big one , so expect the concurrent number of
connection s to be around 2200.To combat the same , want to perform load sharing
on 3-4 servers.So the ide is to put one machine on external IP and this machine
, after rece
24 matches
Mail list logo
