Chuck Goehring wrote:
> Just posted minutes ago on this.
>
> This partially fixed me also. Problem was the line in the /perl container
> (PerlHandler Apache::Registry instead of PerlHandler ModPerl::Registry).
> Except now I get this:
> [Mon Apr 22 18:32:37 2002] [error] 1580: ModPerl::Registry
TECTED]>
To: "xk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: mod_perl installation on Win32
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, xk wrote:
>
> > Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
> > Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_pe
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, xk wrote:
> Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
> Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_02-dev Perl/v5.6.1
>
> Is this mod_perl 1.0 or 2.0? When I installed (from the location you
> pointed - theoryx5) it said mod_perl 2.0, but on Apache is shows 1.99
This is norma
My configuration is now this:
PerlModule Apache2
PerlModule ModPerl::Registry
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler ModPerl::Registry
Options +ExecCGI
When I run a script through Apache, I get the following error in the log:
[error] failed to resolve handler `ModPerl::Registry'
I've
> Did you have an old version of mod_perl installed?
> The modules you are using seem to be from mod_perl 1, while you need the
> mod_perl 2 ones.
I seem to have installed an older version before 2.0, but I'm not sure.
In my /site/lib dir I have both Apache and Apache2 subdir. Is this ok?
And I'
At 20:15 22.04.2002, xk wrote:
> > I assume this is for mod_perl-1?
>
>Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
>Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_02-dev Perl/v5.6.1
>
>Is this mod_perl 1.0 or 2.0? When I installed (from the location you
>pointed - theoryx5) it said mod_perl 2.0, but on A
At 20:35 22.04.2002, David LeBlanc wrote:
>If Apache::Registry depends on Apache to access the registry, I don't
>believe that Apache uses the registry anymore, at least for file
>associations. The old "change this setting to make apache look in the
>registry for file associations" stuff is gone f
xk wrote:
>>I assume this is for mod_perl-1?
>
>
> Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
> Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_02-dev Perl/v5.6.1
>
> Is this mod_perl 1.0 or 2.0? When I installed (from the location you
> pointed - theoryx5) it said mod_perl 2.0, but on Apache is shows
ay, April 22, 2002 11:15
> To: Randy Kobes
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_perl installation on Win32
>
>
> > I assume this is for mod_perl-1?
>
> Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
> Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_02-dev Perl/v5.6.1
>
> I assume this is for mod_perl-1?
Apache version info (shown on error web pages):
Apache/2.0.35 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_02-dev Perl/v5.6.1
Is this mod_perl 1.0 or 2.0? When I installed (from the location you
pointed - theoryx5) it said mod_perl 2.0, but on Apache is shows 1.99
> Do you have a
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, xk wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm getting the following mod_perl error when I try to run a perl script
> through Apache: [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Registry'
>
> My configuration is:
> -
> Alias /perl/ "C:/My Documents/HTML/xk Sound/perl/"
>
> #PerlModule A
Hi.
I'm getting the following mod_perl error when I try to run a perl script
through Apache: [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Registry'
My configuration is:
-
Alias /perl/ "C:/My Documents/HTML/xk Sound/perl/"
#PerlModule Apache::Registry
SetHandler perl-script
Pe
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, xk wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have apache 2.0.35 and ActivePerl 5.6.1 installed on Win32, and I can't
> install mod_perl 1.99_01.
> When I do perl , it says
>
> > Configuring Apache/2.0.35 mod_perl/1.99_01 Perl/v5.6.1
> > unlink...lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm
> > C:/Program Files/Apache
Hi.
I have apache 2.0.35 and ActivePerl 5.6.1 installed on Win32, and I can't
install mod_perl 1.99_01.
When I do perl , it says
> Configuring Apache/2.0.35 mod_perl/1.99_01 Perl/v5.6.1
> unlink...lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm
> C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/bin/Apache.exe -l failed: Bad fil
14 matches
Mail list logo
