On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:28:01PM -0500, Blue Lang wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Eh, I'm prepared to take my lynching, but I'd just like to remind everyone
> that there's nothing at all wrong with using PHP for things like this.
> You'll never be a worse person for lea
> build something large. (Trying to build a garden with three different
> climates and have it work as one big garden is a huge challenge and
> certainly not worth pursuing if you're trying to maximize production.)
I agree with this... however if you have to play in that garden
> because half o
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not going to get sucked into a language advocacy debate. But at least
> in my case, your comments are quite off base.
Oh.
> D) (And I think this is the most important point of all.) There are good
> reasons for deciding on a language and stick
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Blue Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> espoused:
> Eh, I'm prepared to take my lynching, but I'd just like to remind
> everyone that there's nothing at all wrong with using PHP for things
> like this. You'll never be a worse person for learning something new,
> and the overheard require
I'll say just a little now since i'm moving semi slowly on this project.
I'm working on writing a suite that at some point will have a calender
program in it. The whole thing is perl based and the entire web enterface
is going to be done in mod perl. Whole setup will be databased
backed and re
Blue Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
>> > Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
>>
>> I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
>> with one that at least had
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
> > Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
>
> I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
> with one that at least had some decent sheduling features so I could us
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
> Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
> so tightly integrated to your other products, it's almost
> always better to custom write it yourself. Or hack up a freeware
> version.
I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be n
> functionality. WebTrend and Calcium are decent, but cost $400 for our
> situation and any modifications I make would be unsharable. (This
> presumes that their source code is even legible and in any shape to hack
> on.) Am I totally missing something?
Why not just write one to suite your nee
I've looked around the web for perl-based calendar applications for
several hours. There are a significant number out there -- I've
personally checked out a dozen, but they are generally pretty pathetic.
Even most of the ones you can pay for are ugly and have very limited
functionality. WebTre
10 matches
Mail list logo