Hello,
I've tried to install perl-win32-bin-0.6.exe on win98, and the error:
"cannot load /apache/modules/apachemoduleperl into server" appears.
I've revised the paths and I think they're ok, so I don't know how to
solve this..
thanks for your ideas...
Hello,
I've tried to install perl-win32-bin-0.6.exe on win98, and the error:
"cannot load /apache/modules/apachemoduleperl into server" appears.
I've revised the paths and I think they're ok, so I don't know how to
solve this..
thanks for your ideas...
This means the module just isn't there, or it is there but cannot be loaded
by the release you have of Apache. You can get versions of mod_perl.so
compiled for specific Win32 Apache releases at Randy Kobes's site
http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppmpackages/x86/
regards
Rod
- Original Message
Hi,
Apache::Session::Flex doesn't work well when restoring object with
existing session id. It is because Apache::Session tries to call
A::S::Generate::* (currently MD5 only) class's validate() method
which Apache::Session::Flex doesn't set.
Patch below fixes this.
--- Flex.pm.origFri
Hi,
I'm sure this has been discussed, appologies if it has, but I scoured the lists
and docs and didn't get any help.
I have an Apache::Registry script that is using XML::Parser. The parser throws a
'die' call if it encounters a parse error (Why?). I was handling this by putting
the code in an e
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Mark Maunder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure this has been discussed, appologies if it has, but I scoured the lists
> and docs and didn't get any help.
>
> I have an Apache::Registry script that is using XML::Parser. The parser throws a
> 'die' call if it encounters a parse error (W
on 5/4/01 9:28 AM, Mark Maunder at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an Apache::Registry script that is using XML::Parser. The parser throws
> a
> 'die' call if it encounters a parse error (Why?).
Because it's an exception and the parser can't continue.
> I was handling this by
> putting
> the c
Gosh, sometimes I feel like I've forked the mod_perl mailing list :(
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:26:16 +0530
From: Qazi Firdous Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Regarding modperl installation
Hi..
After having gone through your instal
OK this is a little embarrasing... I assumed the script was die'ing when it hit the
XML::Parser routine and that eval wasn't catching the exception. Well the Apache
child is actually segfaulting. (Excuse: I'm running virtual hosts with seperate
logs. I didn't check the main error_log.). I checked
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> on 5/4/01 9:28 AM, Mark Maunder at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have an Apache::Registry script that is using XML::Parser. The parser throws
> > a
> > 'die' call if it encounters a parse error (Why?).
>
> Because it's an exception and the parser can'
On Fri, 4 May 2001, David Lanzarote García wrote:
> Hello,
> I've tried to install perl-win32-bin-0.6.exe on win98, and the error:
> "cannot load /apache/modules/apachemoduleperl into server" appears.
> I've revised the paths and I think they're ok, so I don't know how to
> solve this..
> tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:56 PM
> To: Cees Hek
> Cc: Barry Veinotte; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Insecure dependency errors
>
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Cees Hek wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Barry Veinot
Hi Stas,
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Gosh, sometimes I feel like I've forked the mod_perl mailing list :(
Yeah, I know what you mean. Allow me...
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:26:16 +0530
> From: Qazi Firdous Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Gosh, sometimes I feel like I've forked the mod_perl mailing list :(
You get the most astonishing emails from these consultant types.
"Infosys is a world leader in providing IT consulting and software
services[.]" [1]
>From the world consulting leader
Mark--
While you may be having problems with segfaults because
of expat = yes rule-- i was having similar problems
with XML parser relating to the the die statement.
I do the same thing as far as eval'ing the parsefile
call. Also, I removed the die statement from parser.pm
(v 2.29 line 240 or
"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
> Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should
> heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest
> version 5.005_03. You must compile Perl, Apache and mod_perl with
> the same compiler.
curious - why 5.005_03 as opposed to the rece
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:29:30AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (will trillich) wrote:
> > >sub search {
> > >#
> > >{
> > >use CGI qw/:standard/;
> > >my $form = join '',
> > >map {
> > >hid
Jesse Erlbaum writes:
> I've been trying for THREE DAYS to email SOMEBODY at PERL.COM about
> taking out a damn ad in their Perl.Com newsletter.
The bounces from songline and oreillynet were very bogus. I've sent
your mail to someone high up at perl.com to figure out what's going on
and get in t
Hi all. I've ploughed through the documentation
regarding persistent db connections under mod_perl,
but I guess I'm not properly understanding just what
is meant by persistent connection.
The scenario I have is a simple CGI script running
under Apache::Registry. I added Apache::DBI to
httpd.conf
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne Izatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:17 PM
Subject: Apache::DBI + persistent connections
> Which leads me to think that "persistent" means that,
> if a single script makes multiple connect requests
> (with the s
Wayne,
WI>It is my understanding that when the app is running
WI>and I look at the status under MySQL, that I should
WI>see only one connection. However, what I see is plenty
WI>of connections, as many as there were before I added
WI>Apache::DBI to the mix.
Apache is a forking server. There are
On Fri, 4 May 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
> "G.W. Haywood" wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should
> > heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest
> > version 5.005_03. You must compile Perl, Apache and mod_perl with
> > the sam
Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user who uses
CPAN to keep track of his modules ??? I mean last time I did install
Bundle::libnet or even install CPAN I think it went ahead and installed
perl 5.6.1 Unless ofcourse installing everything from tar balls is what
is suggested
What version of the CPAN module do you have? Version 1.56+ should no longer
"force" you to upgrade.
Aaron Johnson
( is it 1.56 or 1.57, anyway 1.59 is out now and it doesn't force you to
upgrade :^)
Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user wh
Hi there,
On Fri, 4 May 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
> "G.W. Haywood" wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should
> > heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest
> > version 5.005_03.
>
> curious - why 5.005_03 as opposed to the re
Hi there,
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user who uses
> CPAN to keep track of his modules ??? I mean last time I did install
> Bundle::libnet or even install CPAN I think it went ahead and installed
> perl 5.6.1
It tr
I may be wrong on this but doesnt perl 5.05 come with CPAN v 1.48 ???
In anycase I am pretty sure I had to actually abort the upgrade if I
wanted to keep my perl 5.05 everytime I tried to go to CPAN v 1.59. I
will try to lay my hand on a clean box and try it out to see what
happens and get back s
Hi! I recently upgraded a test server to a recent Apache::Filter, and hit
problems due to the new dependency on filter_register() being called. I
don't mind upgrading my filters to call this, but I have one, in which I
use Apache::Request (a sub-class of Apache), which I cannot seem to work
around
Hmm maybe someone can tell me what I am doing wrong ???
Mithun
--
Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 5 subversion 3) configuration:
Platform:
osname=linux, osvers=2.2.5-22smp, archname=i386-linux
uname='linux porky.devel.redhat.com
Hi all,
I'm trying to add a little bit more security to a running app. In this app, I'd
like to be able to confirm what physical file was used in the 'AuthUserFile
/path/to/pass.db' statement. This file choice needs to be dynamic, so I can't
simply hard wire this info.
Thoughts?
Rodney Bro
30 matches
Mail list logo
