Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Any ideas, BTW, on when 2.0 goes gold?
As soon as it's ready. You can see what's left to be done in
modperl-2.0/todo/release (it's in cvs) or see:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/modperl-2.0/todo/release?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
Once this file becomes e
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:17:21PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Does that mean that, no, I *can't* just upgrade my Test? :-)
>
> Yes, you are doomed and you will have to use that version for the
> rest of your life. If you will be a good netizen, may be in the next
> reincarnation you will be able
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 12:12:37PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
[...]
I have to become another CVS hacker!
Couldn't I upgrade my test.pm, instead, Daddy? Please? Can't I?
On the opposite, I'm glad you had an old Test.pm, now others who will come
with
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 12:12:37PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> [...]
> > I have to become another CVS hacker!
> >
> > Couldn't I upgrade my test.pm, instead, Daddy? Please? Can't I?
>
> On the opposite, I'm glad you had an old Test.pm, now others who will come
> with t
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
[...]
I have to become another CVS hacker!
Couldn't I upgrade my test.pm, instead, Daddy? Please? Can't I?
On the opposite, I'm glad you had an old Test.pm, now others who will come
with the stock 5.6.1 won't encounter this problem. We really ought to test the
release wi
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:48:52PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > I dunno, but I guess I'll find out, since mine is 1.15. Maybe the
> > script should check prereq's there, too? I'd been hoping, silly me, to
> > avoid having to become Yet Another Perl hacker on this level, this
> > quickly; how do
I dunno, but I guess I'll find out, since mine is 1.15. Maybe the
script should check prereq's there, too? I'd been hoping, silly me, to
avoid having to become Yet Another Perl hacker on this level, this
quickly; how do I upgrade that?
Your wishes have been granted, you don't need to become Yet
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:25:34PM -0800, Chris Shiflett wrote:
> For what it's worth, I received that message, and it looked as though I
> had intercepted a private email to Stas. :-)
>
> Perhaps you copied the list via BCC?
I replied, accidentally, off list. I tried to bounce the sent message
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:23:12PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > the
> >>bug report instructions should probably be extended to suggest that the
> >>reporter include the output of the make, as well:
>
> absolutely. Please submit a doc patch that will make it clear.
It was actually the bug reporti
ess* ez than I
> thought.
>
> - Forwarded message from Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:49:15 -0800
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [mp2] Can
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Well, I tried to bounce it; apparently, ezmlm is even *less* ez than I
thought.
in which case you should have posted a new reply ;) now you started a new
thread, and if someone will use the archives to find the solution to a similar
problem, they won't find the continuation
bject: Re: [mp2] Can't build mp1.99 on rh7.3 with perl 5.6.1/rpm and apache
2.0.48
Jay, please post this reply to the list, as a reply and we will take it from
there... thanks.
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:32:24PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>Jay R. Ashwo
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:32:24PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> [...]
> > Alas, installing CGI fixed *those* problems, but not the "Not enough
> > arguments for Test::skip" ones; they're still coming up and failing the
> > test, telling me to file a bug. Next suggestion? :
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
[...]
Alas, installing CGI fixed *those* problems, but not the "Not enough
arguments for Test::skip" ones; they're still coming up and failing the
test, telling me to file a bug. Next suggestion? :-)
I'm not sure what you are talking about, your original report didn't conta
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:17:22PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > ModPerl won't build on RH7.3 with perl 5.6.1 from rpm perl-5.6.1-34.99.6
> > Tests fail; verbose error_log attached. Building against freshly (and
> > successfully) built apache 2.0.48 from source with prefork-mpm.
> >
> [...[
> > N
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:17:22PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
> > /appl/src/mod_perl-1.99_11/t/response/TestModules/cgi.pm line 7.
> > Compilation failed in require at (eval 79) line 3.
>
> As you can tell, you need to install CGI.pm. Please install it and
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
My bug report: :-)
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
ModPerl won't build on RH7.3 with perl 5.6.1 from rpm perl-5.6.1-34.99.6
Tests fail; verbose error_log attached. Building against freshly (and
successfully) built
My bug report: :-)
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
ModPerl won't build on RH7.3 with perl 5.6.1 from rpm perl-5.6.1-34.99.6
Tests fail; verbose error_log attached. Building against freshly (and
successfully) built apache 2.0.48 from so
18 matches
Mail list logo
