On 6/7/07, Tina Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but you still save CPU if you have fast templating. maybe you can save a
number of machines.
Unless your templating engine is showing up pretty high on your
Devel::DProf output, you're probably not going to save much. Saving
5% won't mean savin
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 6/6/07, Tina M=FCller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, many people say, why optimize code if the database is slow anyway.
No offense, but those people are entirely correct. Choosing a
template module because of its speed when your application is
On 6/6/07, Tina Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, many people say, why optimize code if the database is slow anyway.
No offense, but those people are entirely correct. Choosing a
template module because of its speed when your application is
constrained by your database doesn't make sense
Sorry, but I suspect there's a mistake in your test. Possibly you
counted the time for JIT to do the initial compile, which is slow but
only happens once. HTML::Template::Compiled is fast, but it's not as
fast as JIT. I don't recommend actually using JIT though, since it's
harder to debug tem
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Tina Müller wrote:
well, many people say, why optimize code if the database is slow
anyway.
i don't like that. if you can optimize by using a fast module - why
not?
and by the way, JIT doesn't have many features, while HT::Compiled has
the dot syntax.
Well wit
quot;abhishek jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Which template engine is best to create a perl site
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, but I suspect there's a mistake in your test. Possibly you
counte
hi,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I don't use HTML::Template::Compiled though, because I found some bugs in
it.
well it was beta at that time, and it's actually still marked as beta on
cpan. you started to use the module really early.
now the biggest bugs have been fixed, and i
hi,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 6/6/07, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tested HTML::Template::JIT, but HTML::Template::Compiled was much
> faster than it.
Sorry, but I suspect there's a mistake in your test. Possibly you
counted the time for JIT to do th
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, but I suspect there's a mistake in your test. Possibly you
counted the time for JIT to do the initial compile, which is slow but
only happens once. HTML::Template::Compiled is fast, but it's not as
fast as JIT. I don't recommend actually using
On 6/6/07, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have tested HTML::Template::JIT, but HTML::Template::Compiled was much
faster than it.
Sorry, but I suspect there's a mistake in your test. Possibly you
counted the time for JIT to do the initial compile, which is slow but
only happens o
HTML::Template::JIT
compiles your entire template into a C program, so it's hard to
believe that anything else is going to be significantly faster than
that.
I have tested HTML::Template::JIT, but HTML::Template::Compiled was much
faster than it.
I don't use HTML::Template::Compiled though, bec
On Jun 5, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
I think that's a pretty questionable claim. TT is faster than
CGI::Ex::Template in normal use with mod_perl. CET is only faster if
you use mod_cgi where TT can't do caching. HTML::Template::JIT
compiles your entire template into a C program,
On 6/5/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the docs:
"CGI::Ex::Template is fast but CGI::Ex::Template::XS is even faster. If
CGI::Ex::Template isn't fast enough for you, the XS version has key
methods coded in C and provides a noticable improvement over the non-XS
version. CET by
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 11:36 -0700, Michael Greenish wrote:
> But I'm locked in to using HTML::Template because I know it, have
> wrapper functions created and I don't have time to figure all that
> stuff out again, plus redo old templates or re-write model classes to
> spit data out in a different
l project.
cheers,
greanie
- Original Message
From: abhishek jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 1:13:41 PM
Subject: Which template engine is best to create a perl site
Hi friends,
I wish to create a scalable site made in PERL and se
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 22:43 +0530, abhishek jain wrote:
> Hi friends,
> I wish to create a scalable site made in PERL and seek guidance which
> templating engine should i use which has less learnig curve also.
> Names comming to my mind are:
> 1. Embperl
> 2. Template::Toolkit
> 3. Html::Mason
C
Hi friends,
I wish to create a scalable site made in PERL and seek guidance which
templating engine should i use which has less learnig curve also.
Names comming to my mind are:
1. Embperl
2. Template::Toolkit
3. Html::Mason
Pl. guide me which will be best or give me a suggestion, if someone has
17 matches
Mail list logo
