I am using mod_perl 1.28 with Apache 1.3.28 on RH 9.0, it is my development server.
I want to 'freeze' a copy of a project and continue to develop using another set of
subdirectories. Using name based virtual hosts I can set a new name, but how do I set
up a series of mod_perl directories with t
Hi all,
I am using RH8.0. I used Apachetoolbox to build an Apache/mod_ssl/mod_perl system with
the supplied Perl 5.8.0, Apache 1.3.28 and mod_perl 1.28.
For my task I need Date::Calc - which had serious problems compiling on the Perl 5.8.0
because of Unicode difficulties. I built Perl 5.8.1 fro
At 08:41 AM 10/23/2003 +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
>I know nothing about the Apachetoolbox, I've never used it, but I'd be
>surprised if there's no documentation with it. Perhaps you'll need to
>reinstall the Apachetoolbox now you have a new Perl. I take it the new
>Perl is now the default in your
At 08:41 AM 10/26/2003 +, Ged Haywood wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Robert Friberg wrote:
>
>> rather old Red Hat Linux, RH 6.0 on intel.
>> [snip]
>> Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) mod_perl/1.21
>
>Ouch. They do need upgrading.
>
>> Besides some occasional and seemingly rand
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
>Phone: +61-3-9251 7067, Fax: +61-3-9251 7604
>http://www.deakin.edu.au/~rons
How are things in my old home town?
John Day
Toronto Canada
In my never ending search for more elegant looking and self-documenting
code I decided to try out the Switch module. In the following fragment of
code:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
# AppSys: Manage Profile
use strict;
use CGI qw/:standard/;
use CGI::Carp qw(fatalsToBrowser);
use Switch;
my $cgi = CGI->
I have been trying to install Apache::Test which is a pre-requisite for something
else. But I get this message:
*** result: NOK
!!! You are running the test suite under user 'root'.
Apache cannot spawn child processes as 'root', therefore
we attempt to run the test suite with user 'nobody' (99:99
At 09:55 PM 11/10/2003 -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:31, Stas Bekman wrote:
>> Thanks Perrin for this comparison numbers, but I think you didn't provide
>> enough build information. Default build opts vary from release to release and
>> from OS to OS, you really need to s
At 06:46 PM 11/11/2003 +, Andrew Green wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:19:31 + (GMT), Ged Haywood wrote:
>
>> If you're using 5.8.0 right now you're probably best advised
>> to wait for Perl 5.8.2, as 5.8.1 has a few issues - but it does work
>> OK.
>
>Really? Is it ill-advised to use 5.8.1