Re: Apache proxy 2.0.48 caching issue

f mod proxy. Especially when used as a reverse proxy. -- I've had to turn it off for now and just through some more hardware up to mitigate the problems. I'm looking for third party patches to mod_cache with fixes. No luck yet. Good luck, I'll let you know if I find a solution.

Re: Apache proxy 2.0.48 caching issue

/ If there is somewhere else where I need to be looking to try out the latest fixes, I would be grateful if you could direct me there. I'm very anxious to get caching back on. It really reduces the number of inbound connections to the real servers from my reverse proxies. Thanks much, chris

Possible infinite loop in mod_proxy

I apologize if this is not the correct place to ask questions about potential mod_proxy bugs. It seemed the best choice, so please correct me (gently) if I am wrong. I have been working with mod_proxy under Apache 2.0.44 and have been having some problems. The basic setup is as follows: Liste

Re: Possible infinite loop in mod_proxy

I have more information on this apparent bug. As I watch the requests move around, I noticed that when making the request through Squid, the connection: keep-alive and other relevant headers are set correctly. When making the request through mod_proxy, those headers disappear. So, here is my t

Re: Possible infinite loop in mod_proxy

Please repost this to the main dev list - this looks like it could be a problem within the filters code, which the proxy makes extensive use of. Thanks, I will do that, along with attaching a debugger as you suggested. C

[PATCH] Enable HTTP tunneling for streaming data where data is le ss than the buffering size

ile this seems like the appropriate fix to the problem, I have to ask if there might be a better way? ----- Chris Conti [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u \ApacheSrc\httpd-2.0.45\modules\proxy\proxy_http.c \ApacheSrc-orig\httpd-2.0.45

RE: reverseproxy using httptunnel

ch as proposed will solve your immediate issue. Of course, feel free to rework the patch if you feel up to it! - Chris Conti mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished. -Ori

where to get patch for 1.3.14

I'm running 1.3.14 and am needing to update the mod_proxy code in my source tree. Is there a tarball or patch that I can get or will I need to get 1.3.20? Because of internal issues I'm not able to upgrade to 1.3.20, but still need the newer proxy code. Any suggestions? Thanks.

failover/loadbalance

s down. Then after the list is exausted give the appropriate error. Or would something like this be better performed by another module such as mod_backhand? Thanks. -- Chris -- Ignorance is bliss. -- Thomas Gray Fortune updates the great quotes, #42: BLISS is ignorance.

Re: adding module mod_proxy to apache - OFFTOPIC

d Graham have mentioned, it doesn't see as though the ldap proxy will be a complete proxy (like Innosoft's directory access router). Am I mistaken? Also, has any thought been given to how non-anonymous ldap connections will be handled (if at all)? Thanks for all the work. -- Chris --

Re: adding module mod_proxy to apache - OFFTOPIC

Graham Leggett wrote: > > "Christopher R Key (Chris)" wrote: > > > Based on what Ian and Graham have mentioned, it doesn't see as though > > the ldap proxy will be a complete proxy (like Innosoft's directory > > access router). Am I mistaken? >

Re: Reverse Proxy

A mess, yes again. Process intensive? Without doubt. Sometimes there are no easy answers. BTW, I've been looking for a solution to this problem myself. Shame you can't do it from within mod_proxy. -- Chris -- Guvf vf zl qvtvgnyyl raunaprq rapelcgrq fvtangher.

Re: httpd-2.0 nightly build log

t out mod_ldap properly. > Wouldn't it be better if this were named mod_proxy_ldap, for clarity I mean. Or will mod_ldap be capable of standing on its own without mod_proxy? -- Chris -- Guvf vf zl qvtvgnyyl raunaprq rapelcgrq fvtangher.

Re: httpd-2.0 nightly build log

Graham Leggett wrote: > > "Christopher R Key (Chris)" wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better if this were named mod_proxy_ldap, for clarity I > > mean. Or will mod_ldap be capable of standing on its own without > > mod_proxy? > > mod_ldap has no dep

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-proxy) Wed Jan 30 23:45:16 EST 2002

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > HTTPD PROXY STATUS: > Last modified at [$Date: 2002/01/18 17:23:32 $] <> > * PR#1547: mod_proxy > No HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR set... > Status: > I think this one has been fixed, at least in the code that I am looki

Re: mod_proxy modification

27;t think that request "fits" what proxy does. http://software.tangent.org/projects.pl?view=mod_layout -- Chris -- Guvf vf zl qvtvgnyyl raunaprq rapelcgrq fvtangher.