On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
We already discussed this stuff recently (look inside the sw-mod-ssl archives
for the details please). So it would be nice when one of the US citizens on
this list who know the current state of their law better than me can
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998, Jake Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
We already discussed this stuff recently (look inside the sw-mod-ssl archives
for the details please). So it would be nice when one of the US citizens on
this list who know the
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, a wrote:
Hi all,
So what is the deal with using mod_ssl and SSLeay for a site that is making
some money? Does everyone actually buy a RSA license? Is it possible to? It
all seems confusing.
There is a commercial product coming out shortly that will use mod_ssl for
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998, a wrote:
So what is the deal with using mod_ssl and SSLeay for a site that is making
some money? Does everyone actually buy a RSA license? Is it possible to? It
all seems confusing.
We already discussed this
Hello,
I just tried to compile a SSL-patched (mod_ssl-2.0.13) apache version,
but *without* activating mod_ssl:
gcc -c -I../../os/unix -I../../include -DSOLARIS2=251 -DMOD_PERL
- -DUSE_HSREGEX -DSERVER_SUBVERSION=\"PHP/3.0.3\" -O2 -DFPX_CORE_PATCH
- -I/usr/local/include `../../apaci`
I saw a few posts in the archives looking for a port of Patch for win32.
here is the one i used. (compiled fine, with some warnings. seems to work
good in initial testing)
binary and patched source
http://www.halcyon.com/tzs/
Chris
On Fri, Oct 30, 1998, Dave Paris wrote:
Email over the exe and I'll create a self-extracting exe for you. Just let
me know where it should default (expand) to.
Oh, I was not precise enough. What I actually want is not only a
self-extracting program. My favorite would be that when I run
Hello again,
There are also missing some conditional Makerules, to prevent
to make the certificate stuff, if mod_ssl is disabled.
Hm `make certificate' needs to know SSL_BASE and other stuff. This is
only calculated when mod_ssl is actually enabled. So there is no chance to ru
n
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:26:21 GMT,
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 1998, Dave Paris wrote:
Email over the exe and I'll create a self-extracting exe for you. Just let
me know where it should default (expand) to.
Oh, I was not precise enough. What I
A lot of fixed and enhancements took place between 2.1b6 and 2.1b7. The most
noticeable enhancement (as I mentioned a few days ago) is Dynamic Shared
Object (DSO) support for mod_ssl. Read http://www.apache.org/docs/dso.html for
more details about DSO and the top-level INSTALL file of mod_ssl
On Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 09:58:57AM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998, Jake Buchholz wrote:
You need to buy the BSAFE development libraries (although 4.0 exists,
only 3.0 is available for linux, but this is sufficient, since 4.0 seems
to only add stuff that doesn't
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998 16:48:26 GMT,
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Trung or others: It should be now possible to also build mod_ssl
as a .DLL under Win32. I've no experiences here, so I hope you
contribute a few patches to me which allows us to build mod_ssl
the
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Jake Buchholz wrote:
I'd love to pass along more information (It'd make things easier for me
to recompile each time a new version of SSLeay, Apache, or mod_ssl came
out ;) but I'm not sure to what extent I'm allowed to help. (Seeing as
how I'm in the states, yadda
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Will this product use it in a way that it can be incorporated into a
custom-compiled Apache? The best product for many uses would put the
minimum wrapping around RSA's stuff needed to have them consider it a
valid license, and preserve the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
[...a interesting discussion on the apache-ssl list with
Ben Laurie whether assertions in server code are reasonable or not...]
The discussion is pointless unless you can indicate a way in which it
makes Apache-SSL function incorrectly.
How about
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
So on a typical system an attacker who gained access to _any_ account (not
necessarily the UID of the httpd or the gcache process) can simply dropping
down gcache and this way all httpds by just sending garbage to the gcache
port.
What does
16 matches
Mail list logo
