RE: 'multiply defined' errors in compile...

2001-12-13 Thread Simon Ritchie
but when it gets to src/modules, it bombs... Has anyone encountered these 'multiply defined' errors, and figured out a way around them? I had something similar the other day. Fundamentally it's a simple problem, but I know from my teaching days that people find this aspect of compilation a

Re: Multiple CRLs with same CA

2001-12-13 Thread Schaefer,Lorrayne J.
Yes, you can use OCSP with Entrust issued certificates. Lorrayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Lorrayne, Thanks for your input. By any chance, do you know if i can use OCSP with an Entrust CA (instead of CRLs)? Regards, Alec

Re: Multiple CRLs with same CA

2001-12-13 Thread Rich Salz
Valicert has listed Entrust as one of its partners. I would assume that would mean that Valicert can interoperate with Entrust issued certificates. I think it is stretching things to say that partnership implies full parsing of the various Entrust CRL's. How many partnerships do you know

Re: Multiple CRLs with same CA

2001-12-13 Thread Schaefer,Lorrayne J.
Rich, I'll check w/ an Entrust engineer today to see if I can get an honest (ha!) answer from him regarding your concerns. Lorrayne __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing

Re: Multiple CRLs with same CA

2001-12-13 Thread Rich Salz
i'd ask a valicert person, actually. -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.com __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)

Re: Multiple CRLs with same CA

2001-12-13 Thread Alec . Barea
Hello there, Thanks a lot for your help and input. Actually i found a solution to the problem. Entrust allows partitioned CRLs by default (CRLs are splited for scalability purposes) but you can enable the combined CRL which will not be splitted (for compatibilty, as the partioned CRL is only an

Re: [BUGFIX], was Re: Problems with SHMCB session caching

2001-12-13 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Ah, thanks Joe. I was trying to track down where I'd seen another such SIGBUS problem and couldn't for the life of me find it. I will roll this other case in together with the other stuff that's come up of late and resubmit it all back to Ralf ASAP. Cheers, Geoff On Friday 14 December 2001

RE: [BUGFIX], was Re: Problems with SHMCB session caching

2001-12-13 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
And there is one more type of SIGBUS problems around line 1103/line 1001 of ssl_scache_shmcb.c - some wierd optimization being done by gcc and the resulting pointer is not aligned correctly (Geoff - I'd contacted you in late August regarding this).. I'd resolved it by opting 'cc' - and now, I'm