RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread Jay Burgess
I could have written your email word for word! I've been trying to keep Apache/mod_ssl running on WIN32 since early December, and still haven't figured out what's wrong. Josef's patch seemed to work for him, but even after applying it, my SSL-enabled Apache only runs a few minutes under

RE: apache+mod_ssl kill -USR1

2002-01-17 Thread Julian C. Dunn
On 17-Jan-2002 Roman V Moroz wrote: Is there possiblity to restart Apache with mod_ssl graceful (with kill -USR1 httpd)? Yes, it's possible, but if you are adding or deleting new SSL virtual hosts, you cannot use SIGUSR1; it needs a full restart. Unless you're asking a totally different

mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Gabriel Lopez Millán
When? Thanks, Gabi. -- - Gabriel Lopez Millan - Grupo ANTS-CIRCuS Facultad de Informtica Universidad de Murcia (Espaa) Tfo: +34 968367645

RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread Son
i've actually made some hacks to get it to work; i was able to build a debug version and found that there were problems in the ssl log code. as a temporary fix, i was able to disable that portion of the code, so it crashes much much less (i rarely see it anymore). however, as a drawback, i no

Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Mads Toftum
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:56:24PM +0100, Gabriel Lopez Millán wrote: When? There will be no mod_ssl patch for apache 2.0. Ralf donated the mod_ssl code to Apache and it has been included in the Apache 2.0 distribution. vh Mads Toftum -- With a rubber duck, one's never alone.

Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: When? Apache 2.0.X already ships with mod_ssl, because we already ported mod_ssl to Apache 2 a few months ago and gifted the source code to the ASF. This way you no longer need an SSL/TLS add-on module for Apache 2.

RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread nirvana
Don't have heavy load yet myself, but afraid I will have same problem on one machine. Here is my thinking from experience with other code: Heavy load and Win32 indicates the problem has to do with concurrency by threading. Reasoning: Easy load doesn't cause much concurrency. And under

Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread nirvana
Have problem building that under Windows. Using cygwin. Using the Visual C++ dsw/dsp projects. Rest of Apache 2.0.28 builds fine. Have put in openssl etc. (Previously on same machine have successfully built 1.3.20 with mod_ssl, still do.) The problem is specific to lex, specifically flex,

RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread Enrico Demarin
Well I became aware of the problem when I started refreshing an ssl page very fast from localhost... So I guess the load doesn't have to be -that- high to reproduce the problem. I agree there must be some problem in the threading code. I tried apache 2.0 with mod_ssl but I couldn't get it to work

Re: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread Patrick Willart
I used this very good HOWTO document by Balázs Bárány. http://tud.at/programm/apache-ssl-win32-howto.php3 Besides that I also had set KeepAlive to Off to work around a multithreading problem. Another tip is to compile OpenSSL with ms\do_ms instead of ms\do_masm. The masm compilation generated

RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)

2002-01-17 Thread Leo Baschy
If you indeed refresh then that would be on the same connection and threading would not be involved if it is a page by itself in one file (i.e. without images, without frames). Important detail: Are you refreshing a single resource (file)? If not, then please test that simplified case.

Multiple SSL-enabled vhosts

2002-01-17 Thread Joe Auty
Hi, Thanks to all those that helped me with my original problem and being patient with my dependence on this list. I think I'm starting to 'get it'. I just have (hopefully) one more question before I leave you guys alone =) I want to have 2 different certificates used in 2 different