mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Robert Flicker
Hi: I have developed a custom module for a company and works fine with normal apache. When pathing apache with modssl stuff works fine under non-encrypted connections but with ssl fails. The module intercepts the post data (ap_get_client_block and this stuff) writes to a file and swaps the

Re: mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Sergi Mayordomo
Robert Flicker escribió: Hi: I have developed a custom module for a company and works fine with normal apache. When pathing apache with modssl stuff works fine under non-encrypted connections but with ssl fails. The module intercepts the post data (ap_get_client_block and this stuff)

Re: mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Robert Flicker
Does your module need any start configuration at httpd.conf? if it does, the lines Perl .. .. /Perl in the remote machine definition solves the problem. I dont know if it is the best solution. Bye No it does not use any configuration at http.conf... i can detect if apache was started with

RePost: Error 403 with Client Authentication - modssl 2.8.8

2002-04-09 Thread Rabellino Sergio
Sorry for my repost, but we continue to get an error if requesting an automatic listing from a directory under Client Authentication with FakeBasicAuth enabled. We are using successfully an old release (Apache 1.3.14 / ModSSL 2.7.1 / OpenSSL 0.9.6), now we would to upgrade our apache engine

Re: [BugDB] SSL problem question (PR#692)

2002-04-09 Thread modssl-bugdb
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi my name is Jaymes Redus and I work with Affliated Computer Systems here in Tallahassee, I just wanted to ask a question concerning a SSL issue that we are having. We are having a problem with our Upload functionality on our Web Application. It

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:18:29AM +0300, Eli Marmor wrote: Anyway, the fact is that all of the discussions regarding 2.0 are done in the new-httpd list, and not here (at least till this thread). So it is clear that something must be done. Maybe a request to new-httpd subscribers to move the

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:49:37AM -0700, Lynn Gazis wrote: What options are needed to configure, with Apache 2.0, to make sure that mod_ssl is enabled, and that a particular OpenSSL directory is used? I tried guessing at the right options, but a look at the httpd.conf file in the resulting

Re: RePost: Error 403 with Client Authentication - modssl 2.8.8

2002-04-09 Thread Nick Miles
My guess is a bug...I had the same problem for some time, eventually I found a solution in the archives, I believe it was this one: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modsslm=98995735231070w=2 So comment out that section of code then recompile and all will be ok. Downside to this will be

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:34:12PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Eli Marmor wrote: I think that we should open a special mailing list for mod_ssl of Apache2. My personal opinion would be that most modssl users' questions will be of the same nature regardless of

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:52:26PM +1200, Geoff Thorpe wrote: I would respectfully suggest that modssl discussions stay here. I don't want to rag on Apache 2.0, and I'm sure a lot of good things have found their way into it, but it does not solve a number of issues that I think many people

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mads Toftum wrote: I too could add a whole lot of reasons to not migrate if you're doing SSL. Up to about a week before Apache went GA, there were substantial commits to SSL code which to me makes it an essentially untested module. While I can't wholly disagree with you,

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Eli Marmor
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mads Toftum wrote: I too could add a whole lot of reasons to not migrate if you're doing SSL. Up to about a week before Apache went GA, there were substantial commits to SSL code which to me makes it an essentially untested module. While I

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Eli Marmor wrote: This, exactly, was one of my intentions when I opened this thread. Glad to hear it. :) BTW: Great article about 2.0, Cliff! (IIRC, it was Linux Magazine). Thanks! It's good to know that people got something out of it. shameless plug PS: for anyone

Re: Apache 2.0 and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread George Walsh
I, for one, would be more than happy to use Apache 2.0. BUT, I need mod_ssl to function and as I understand it, mod_ssl applications cannot cope with cgi, so I really have no place to start. Running without the nedd for https, I have been VERY impressed with Apache 2.0's speed and efficiency,

Re: Apache 2.0 and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, George Walsh wrote: I, for one, would be more than happy to use Apache 2.0. BUT, I need mod_ssl to function and as I understand it, mod_ssl applications cannot cope with cgi, so I really have no place to start. Just to clarify for those who might be listening and didn't

RE: Re: Apache 2.0 and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread George Walsh
Thanks for clarifying this for the group, Cliff. Our 'hangup' was admittedly a little specific, and I am working my way around that right now - if for no other reason than to reduce the updating cycle. (Yeah, I still cannot love distribution rpms! May the Good Lord forgive my intransigence

Need mod_ssl to install with existing Apache

2002-04-09 Thread Server Admin
I am running FBSD 4.5-stable with Apache-1.3.23 with numerous mods and other dependents all set, configured running okay. BUT, now need SSL and must install just the mod_ssl without any other changes, except OpenSSH that I (believe?) I can activate from the base system. Being this is my first

Re: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:03:28AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mads Toftum wrote: I too could add a whole lot of reasons to not migrate if you're doing SSL. Up to about a week before Apache went GA, there were substantial commits to SSL code which to me makes it an

Re: Need mod_ssl to install with existing Apache

2002-04-09 Thread Aryeh Katz
Jack, I am running FBSD 4.5-stable with Apache-1.3.23 with numerous mods and other dependents all set, configured running okay. BUT, now need SSL and must install just the mod_ssl without any other changes, except OpenSSH that I (believe?) I can activate from the base system. Being this

Optional client certs or basic auth

2002-04-09 Thread David LaPorte
Hello all, I'm trying to setup a website that allows client certs if a client has one, but uses HTTP basic auth over SSL otherwise. Using the example at: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_howto.html#ToC10 as a guide, I came up with the following: ### SSLCACertificatePath

Re: Apache 2.0 and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Cyb.org
I have some questions related to Apache 2.0, SSL and IPv6. IPv6-based VHosts for SSL will work? Cyb.org __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Optional client certs or basic auth

2002-04-09 Thread David LaPorte
Hello all, I'm trying to setup a website that allows client certs if a client has one, but uses HTTP basic auth over SSL otherwise. Using the example at: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_howto.html#ToC10 as a guide, I came up with the following: ### SSLCACertificatePath

apache 2.0 trying to reinitialise ssl

2002-04-09 Thread Martin Hofmann
I am trying to run apache 2.0.35 with ssl on a Solaris box. I can compile and install without any problems. But when I try and run it fails with an error message about (theoretically impossible) failed re-initialisation of SSL (see log extract below) (i also tried configuring mod_ssl as a

RE: Apache 2.0.* and SSL

2002-04-09 Thread Lynn Gazis
OK, I've tested it, and so far it isn't working for me. Here are my tests: 1) Attempt to configure, on an HP UX 11.0 system, to use SSL with a cryptographic accelerator card: Set up Apache 1.3.23, on this same system, and confirmed that it ran and successfully accessed the CryptoSwift card.

Re: Problem with File-Upload20k

2002-04-09 Thread Ben Groeneveld
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Michael Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did any of you ever resolve this issue? I corresponded several months ago with Mark, who recommended an upgrade to rh7, since he didn't see the problem there anymore. I