On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Arthur Chan wrote:
> But I want Netscape to load my certificate as an "Authority" for our
> testing purposes. How does one go about doing that, both in Netscape and
> MSIE5 ?
Google knows everything... an "I'm feeling lucky" for "installing CA
certificate" yields:
http://www
Well, my eyes did glaze over somewhere betw thermodynamics and mobile
perpetuum ;-)
So does this mean that if I work in a less sophisticated infrastructure
where only 56kbps ppp dialup is available, I can get some incremental gain
by zipping it up before encrypting it ? [yes/no]
Caveats ?
And here
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> "Dave Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In addition to Owen's salient points about compression working efficiently
> > on repetitive strings in plaintext/binary data (e.g. whitespace in a Word
> > document) and not on random data (e.g. encrypted dat
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Nauman, Ahmed [IT] wrote:
> How can we know at server side in apache that a GET or PUT request has
> been received and it was failed or successfull ? Can we get somehow the
> response code so that some script and/or tool at Server side can
> delete/archive the file which have
Your actual message issue notwithstanding, the versions you're running are
not just old, they've got security flaws and vulnerabilities well documented
at both CERT, apache.org, and openssl.org.
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html (Linux, Apache, OpenSSL,
mod_ssl)
http://www.cert.org/a
Hi All,
How can we know at server side in apache that a GET or PUT request has been
received and it was failed or successfull ? Can we get somehow the response
code so that some script and/or tool at Server side can delete/archive the
file which have been retrieved by the client in some specific f
I'm trying to understand when a CRL list gets read by Apache. I have
cases of it being read when a new CRL is placed in the directory and
the "make" is run, and cases when it does not get read under identical
circumstances.
The only reliable way that I have to make sure that the CRL gets
upda
"Dave Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In addition to Owen's salient points about compression working efficiently
> on repetitive strings in plaintext/binary data (e.g. whitespace in a Word
> document) and not on random data (e.g. encrypted data), some encryption
> algorithms can actually be we
"Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Arthur Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >Hi Boyle,
> >I've been debating with myself over whether to encrypt
> >everything, that's a
> >cogent argument you have offered. I have a few questions myself :
> >(1) assu
At 02:22 AM 8/19/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Henrik Bentel wrote:
> Now, all my ssl configuration is under my secure virtual host, such that it
> applies to everything. However, I have quite a bit static content(images,
> css, javascript.,...) which doesn't need to be very secure.
In addition to Owen's salient points about compression working efficiently
on repetitive strings in plaintext/binary data (e.g. whitespace in a Word
document) and not on random data (e.g. encrypted data), some encryption
algorithms can actually be weakened by compressing the resulting data,
giving
>-Original Message-
>From: Arthur Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Hi Boyle,
>I've been debating with myself over whether to encrypt
>everything, that's a
>cogent argument you have offered. I have a few questions myself :
>(1) assuming an openssl encrypted packet is bigger than a
>plai
Hi Boyle,
I've been debating with myself over whether to encrypt everything, that's a
cogent argument you have offered. I have a few questions myself :
(1) assuming an openssl encrypted packet is bigger than a plain text one,
would mod_gzip shrink it significantly to warrant the effort?
(2) and wou
>-Original Message-
>From: Henrik Bentel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I have a web app which serves both static and non static content, both
>secure and unsecure(https and http).
>Now, all my ssl configuration is under my secure virtual host,
>such that it applies to everything. However,
14 matches
Mail list logo
