On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)
I didn't see any feedback, do any of the Apache guru's have comments? Any
clarifications? (I hope I made the specifics clear enough, below.)
Hmmm... the cleanup is done in
mod_ssl 2.8.26 for Apache 1.3.35 is now available:
o http://www.modssl.org/source/
o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/
Yours,
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)
I didn't see any feedback, do any of the Apache guru's have comments? Any
clarifications? (I hope I made the specifics clear enough, below.)
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:58:42AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006, Love Hörnquist Åstrand wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 CRYPTO_get_ex_data (ad=0xe8, idx=137019688) at ex_data.c:628
#1 0x4035c035 in SSL_get_ex_data (s=0x1, idx=296) at ssl_lib.c:2220
Looks like
Please rmove me from your list"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The following patches mop up some unnecessary compile warnings, when the functions are properly decorated. It's been sitting in my drafts waiting for a subscription to go
D i have to report you as spam or what please remove! THANKYOU"William A. Rowe, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)I didn't see any feedback, do any of the
