I am not sure. The version I encountered problem is 2.0.55.
On 4/26/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:50PM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> > FYI.
> >
> > We had to choose to test that by using other versions and we found
> > that the problem is resolved if we down
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:50PM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> FYI.
>
> We had to choose to test that by using other versions and we found
> that the problem is resolved if we downgrade to 2.0.50.
Was this an exhaustive search: 2.0.51 failed but 2.0.50 worked? That
would be a little surprising: th
FYI.
We had to choose to test that by using other versions and we found
that the problem is resolved if we downgrade to 2.0.50.
Ken
On 4/22/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI.
>
> I have tried to test upload with Firefox. But it turns out that it
> fails too. Then, it might not be o
FYI.
I have tried to test upload with Firefox. But it turns out that it
fails too. Then, it might not be only a MSIE issue.
On 4/22/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My colleague has helped to deploy the patch and the ssl vhost has been
> configured as follow:
>
> Doc
Joe,
Do you mind telling me how to apply the patch? Type command as follow?
patch -s < .patch
Do I need to stop the httpd server? or recompile or anything else?
Thanks.
On 4/21/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ic. Thanks so much. I will apply that patch and see what is going o
ic. Thanks so much. I will apply that patch and see what is going on later.
On 4/21/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > We are using 2.0.55 already. Is it already include that patch?
>
> No, it will be in 2.0.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> We are using 2.0.55 already. Is it already include that patch?
No, it will be in 2.0.56 and later. But note this only applies if you
are using a reverse proxy, and it only affects the application of the
BrowserMatch state
Hi Joe,
We are using 2.0.55 already. Is it already include that patch?
Ken
On 4/21/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:23:24AM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> > Cliff,
> >
> > I have reset the timeout to 600, but the problem remains. I wonder
> > whether it's the tim
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:23:24AM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> Cliff,
>
> I have reset the timeout to 600, but the problem remains. I wonder
> whether it's the timeout problem because the problem appears
> immediately after presssing Upload!
>
> Sometimes the problem is "Page can't be displayed; so
Cliff,
I have reset the timeout to 600, but the problem remains. I wonder
whether it's the timeout problem because the problem appears
immediately after presssing Upload!
Sometimes the problem is "Page can't be displayed; sometimes it is
what I mentioned at the very beginning that file can't bee
Cliff:
It's been set as the default one: 300.
I wonder how many I need to set, say possibly my application has the
functionality of uploading attachment, max 2.5MB.
I have tried to search everywhere for solution for the same problem
(ssl_engine_io.c OpenSSL: I/O error). I surprisingly found tha
On 4/20/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Thu Apr 20 17:04:46 2006] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1523): OpenSSL: I/Oerror, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#81d53d8 [mem: 81eeef8]Just like it sounds from the message, this error occurs when the call to SSL_read() in ssl_io_input_read() fails with th
part of the log when I try to upload 2nd time:
[Thu Apr 20 17:04:31 2006] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1512): OpenSSL:
read 335/335 bytes from BIO#81d53d8 [mem: 81eeefd] (BIO dump follows)
[Thu Apr 20 17:04:31 2006] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1459):
+
Hi, Cliff,
The below is the error in ssl-error_log when I am trying to save a large image:
[Thu Apr 20 16:55:36 2006] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1523): OpenSSL: I/O
error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#81f94a8 [mem: 81f9640]
[Thu Apr 20 16:55:36 2006] [info] (70007)The timeout specified has
expired
On 4/19/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now seems when uploading big file has problem in ssl. When I upload a3K image file, it's ok. But when I upload a 35K image file. Itfailed.Ah, I see.
Is there any place to set the cache/buffer? Or I have to setSSLSessionCache and SSLSessionCacheTim
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for your advice.
Now seems when uploading big file has problem in ssl. When I upload a
3K image file, it's ok. But when I upload a 35K image file. It
failed.
Is there any place to set the cache/buffer? Or I have to set
SSLSessionCache and SSLSessionCacheTimeout?
By the way,
On 4/18/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. If users access our server via https:// through the webserver, it fails to upload. Backend source encounteredNullPointerException when accessing the FileItem requested.2. But if users access our server via http://... through the web
server,
Hi all,
I have setup a SunOne App server in linux and Apache HTTP Server with
Open SSL for users to access it.
When access the application and try to upload a file in one
functionality module of the application, some problems encountered:
1. If users access our server via https:// through
18 matches
Mail list logo
