On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)
I didn't see any feedback, do any of the Apache guru's have comments? Any
clarifications? (I hope I made the specifics clear enough, below.)
Hmmm... the cleanup is done in
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)
I didn't see any feedback, do any of the Apache guru's have comments? Any
clarifications? (I hope I made the specifics clear enough, below.)
D i have to report you as spam or what please remove! THANKYOU"William A. Rowe, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)I didn't see any feedback, do any of the
Ping, in anticipation of a 2.8.26 for 1.3.35 (are we expecting one?)
I didn't see any feedback, do any of the Apache guru's have comments? Any
clarifications? (I hope I made the specifics clear enough, below.)
Yours,
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Maintainers,
This patch addresses a
Maintainers,
This patch addresses a still-outstanding flaw in mod_ssl, on *all* platforms.
However it's rarely evident on any platform other than Win32, because only Win32
recycles memory -so quickly- on other threads, that the cleanup cannot be
invoked.
Instead, in the LogRequest
