Re: [BugDB] Performance issue (PR#723)

2002-07-01 Thread Denis A.V.Jr.
Hi Lutz... I compile apache using...: (from mod_ssl dir) export CFLAGS='-DHARD_SERVER_LIMIT=8192'; ./configure --disable-rule=DEV_RANDOM --disable-rule=EXPAT --disable-rule=IRIXN32 --disable-rule=IRIXNIS --disable-rule=SHARED_CHAIN --disable-rule=WANTHSREGEX --enable-module=most

Re: [BugDB] Performance issue (PR#723)

2002-06-29 Thread modssl-bugdb
Hi, I tried with the prngd and exactly the same problem appeared. =( Regards On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 05:52, Thomas Binder wrote: Hi! On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:49:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This caused a different behavior. I mean, it took a little while (~3 minutes), to the

Re: [BugDB] Performance issue (PR#723)

2002-06-26 Thread modssl-bugdb
Hi Thomas, I'll try that and send the results to the list. thank you On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 05:52, Thomas Binder wrote: Hi! On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:49:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This caused a different behavior. I mean, it took a little while (~3 minutes), to the loadav get

Re: [BugDB] Performance issue (PR#723)

2002-06-24 Thread Thomas Binder
Hi! On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:49:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This caused a different behavior. I mean, it took a little while (~3 minutes), to the loadav get high, and after a few minutes, it got worse... the loadav reached ~60... Without the no-threads no-idea -fPIC options at the

[BugDB] Performance issue (PR#723)

2002-06-22 Thread modssl-bugdb
the performance issue. And the same happens with any version newer than the case 1. The same stress situation, under this condition, same config httpd.conf file, the server works on a ~40 loadav. In this case 2, I opened a new test, under the same conditions, but the compilation of the OpenSSL. I tried

Re: Performance Issue

2002-04-04 Thread Denis A.V.Jr.
Definetly, Cliff. I'll send it to you ASAP. Thank you. On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 17:48, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Alex wrote: I am experiencing exactly the same issue after upgrade of couple of servers in our web-farm from Sol.2.6 to Solaris 8 (running on Sun Enterprise).

Re: Performance Issue

2002-04-01 Thread Alex
Denis, I am experiencing exactly the same issue after upgrade of couple of servers in our web-farm from Sol.2.6 to Solaris 8 (running on Sun Enterprise). We are using Apache 1.3.9 on Solaris 2.6, Apache 1.3.23/mod_ssl 2.8.7 on Solaris 8. So far I haven't figured out why it is so, currently

Re: Performance Issue

2002-04-01 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Alex wrote: I am experiencing exactly the same issue after upgrade of couple of servers in our web-farm from Sol.2.6 to Solaris 8 (running on Sun Enterprise). We are using Apache 1.3.9 on Solaris 2.6, Apache 1.3.23/mod_ssl 2.8.7 on Solaris 8. Please, let me know if you

Performance Issue

2002-03-28 Thread Denis A.V.Jr.
Hey there, I have a few webservers using apache+mod_ssl in our site. I have noticed, with the installation of 1.3.2[34] and mod_ssl2.8.[78], a significant performance situation. Now I have a very high load average, which I never had before with older versions of the software (ex:

Re: Performance Issue

2002-03-28 Thread Denis A.V.Jr.
I compiled it using...: export CFLAGS='-DHARD_SERVER_LIMIT=8192'; ./configure --with-apache=../apache_1.3.24 --with-ssl=../openssl-0.9.6c --disable-rule=DEV_RANDOM --disable-rule=EXPAT --disable-rule=IRIXN32 --disable-rule=IRIXNIS --disable-rule=WANTHSREGEX --enable-module=most

Re: Performance Issue

2002-03-28 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 13:05, Denis A.V.Jr. wrote: I have a few webservers using apache+mod_ssl in our site. I have noticed, with the installation of 1.3.2[34] and mod_ssl2.8.[78], a significant performance situation. Now I have a very high load average, which I never had before with older