Re: lex and yacc was Re: Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-11 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mads Toftum wrote: > Given that this is probably the same problem as we have seen with the > "old" mod_ssl - my guess is more like a broken tar that resets timestamps. That could explain some of it. But I feel like there might be something else going on too, because... > B

Re: lex and yacc was Re: Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-11 Thread Mads Toftum
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:09:07AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > I *wish* I could figure out why it is that mod_ssl feels the need to > regenerate the scanner and parser sometimes. It happens to me every now > and then but I haven't pinned down the cause. Best guess is that you did > a copy of t

Re: lex and yacc was Re: Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-11 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, paul priestman wrote: > flex -Pssl_expr_yy -s -B > /home/user/jwoodman/apache/httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.l > sh: flex: not found > *** Error code 1 I *wish* I could figure out why it is that mod_ssl feels the need to regenerate the scanner and parser sometimes.