"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, EKR wrote:
>
> > [..]
> > > mod_ssl.c(207) : error C2078: too many initializers
> > > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl.exe' : return code '0x2'
> > > Stop.
> > > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
> >
>
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, EKR wrote:
> [..]
> > mod_ssl.c(207) : error C2078: too many initializers
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl.exe' : return code '0x2'
> > Stop.
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
> > Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE
> > .EXE"' : return code '0x2'
> > Stop.
>
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, Daniel Reichenbach wrote:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
Why is mod_ssl broken if you get a page fault inside OpenSSL? Instead I woul
"Daniel Reichenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
>
> mod_ssl 2.4.5 doesn`t even compile. It produces the following output,
> us
Hy there,
i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
connection is established.
mod_ssl 2.4.5 doesn`t even compile. It produces the following output,
using Visual C++6 plus Service Pack 3:
cl.
