Re: Mod_SSL with Name Based Virtual Hosts

2002-02-10 Thread Glen Mehn
you can do it by using different ports, but then you'll have to construct URL's like: https://secure.domain.com:8443/path/to/resource it's a limitation of the protocol. glen On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:46:56AM +0700, Denny Suvanto wrote: Dear guys, Can I use mod_ssl for separate domains

Mod_SSL with Name Based Virtual Hosts

2002-02-09 Thread Denny Suvanto
Dear guys, Can Iuse mod_ssl forseparate domains with the same IP address using name based virtual hosts? If so, how? Thanks Best Regards Yohanes Denny Suvanto

Re: Mod_SSL with Name Based Virtual Hosts

2002-02-09 Thread Andreas Gietl
On Saturday 09 February 2002 03:46, you wrote: No this isn't possible because as far as i know there's no HTTP/1.1-like Hostname Extension to the https-protocol. Dear guys, Can I use mod_ssl for separate domains with the same IP address using name based virtual hosts? If so, how? Thanks

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread robert
: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can some one send me the proper syntax for setting up name-based virtual host with ssl? I have tried several things and only nonvitrual host seem to work. thanks Robert

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Owen Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? Or will I have to buy public ips? I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host per IP address (otherwise there is no point in doing this for ordinary HTTP). Think it

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread John . Airey
Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 July 2001 14:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts Can I assign privet ip's

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Owen Boyle wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? Or will I have to buy public ips? I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host per IP address (otherwise there is no

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Eric Rescorla
Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, this is a problem with how *HTTPS* works - SSL (and TLS) are just channel-level encryption and/or authentication protocols, what you tunnel through them (and what semantic juggling you do with the peer-certificates, such as URL -- CN

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-23 Thread Magnus Stenman
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Grant Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts Jeff wrote: What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-22 Thread robert
18, 2001 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts Jeff wrote: What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well, but my cert

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-18 Thread Michael Grant
Jeff wrote: What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well, but my cert isn't *.domain.dom, it's just cn=domain.dom. The virtual hosts are of the form

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Thanks for the reply. If you're using the same SSL configuration and the same certificate for both hosts (generally not an option in the real world because of the security alert boxes it brings up in the browser), then you won't _notice_ a problem with namevirtualhost. That's because you're

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-16 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Jan Vejvalka wrote: NameVirtualHost 1.2.3.4:443 VirtualHost 1.2.3.4:443 ServerName host1.mydomain.dom DocumentRoot /data/host1 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] /VirtualHost VirtualHost 1.2.3.4:443 ServerName host2.mydomain.dom DocumentRoot /data/host2 ServerAdmin

mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

1999-09-09 Thread Mike
Hi everyone Please forgive a beginners' possibly ignorant question... My first attempt at this... I have a server with several name based virtual hosts on it. As I discovered, mod_ssl won't work with name based virtual hosts, for reasons discussed earlier on this list. My question is, will

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

1999-09-09 Thread Henrik Olsen
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Mike wrote: Hi everyone Please forgive a beginners' possibly ignorant question... My first attempt at this... I have a server with several name based virtual hosts on it. As I discovered, mod_ssl won't work with name based virtual hosts, for reasons discussed