e -
From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "modssl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: modssl for Apache 2.0
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Chuck Goehring wrote:
>
> > I see all the activity on the list about
he need for ssl - Not doing ecomerce.
>
>Chuck
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "George Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:07 PM
>Subject: RE: modssl for Apache 2.0
>
>
>> Chuck:
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:07 PM
Subject: RE: modssl for Apache 2.0
> Chuck:
>
> With Apache 2.0, mod_ssl is a part of the 'whole'. The build is a far
simpler process, and the server, at least in my experience, is much crisper
in terms of respo
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
> I've found this, do I point at the openssl dir I have the all the sub dirs
> and bins installed in, or to the source tree they were compiled from?
The install dir's prefix. So, for example, if your OpenSSL is in /usr/lib
and /usr/include/openssl, then y
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
> Lookin at it now. So, are compile directives pretty much the same, as for
> pointing at the ssl source and mm source trees? The docs are not as clear
> on this as Ralf has them in the mod-ssl structures .
Look at ./configure --help for starters. Hint
Lookin at it now. So, are compile directives pretty much the same, as for
pointing at the ssl source and mm source trees? The docs are not as clear
on this as Ralf has them in the mod-ssl structures .
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. D
R. DuFresne wrote:
>
> When is apache 2.0 coming out of beta and into primetime?
April 6, 2002.
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO, Founder
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
__
Tel.: +972-9-766-1020 8 Yad-Harutzim St
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
> When is apache 2.0 coming out of beta and into primetime?
How did you manage to miss the party? :) It went GA last week with the
release of 2.0.35.
--Cliff
__
Apache Interface to Ope
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, George Walsh wrote:
> As for windows, that is NOT my cup of tea. We are a Micro-soft Free zone
> here, so I cannot comment on the peculiarities you might experience in
> your environment. I really do not know hy you would want to run a secure
> server on top of a windows box,
When is apache 2.0 coming out of beta and into primetime?
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, George Walsh wrote:
> Chuck:
>
> With Apache 2.0, mod_ssl is a part of the 'whole'. The build is a far simpler
>process, and the server, at least in my experience, is much crisper in terms of
Chuck:
With Apache 2.0, mod_ssl is a part of the 'whole'. The build is a far simpler process,
and the server, at least in my experience, is much crisper in terms of response.
As for windows, that is NOT my cup of tea. We are a Micro-soft Free zone here, so I
cannot comment on the peculiarities
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Chuck Goehring wrote:
> I see all the activity on the list about Apache 2.0 and modssl. Where
> can I get the necessary "stuff" for Apache 2.0. I don't see it on the
> modssl, openssl or Apache web sites. I need to get ssl up on Apache on
> Windows 2000.
mod_ssl now comes
I see all the activity on the list about Apache 2.0
and modssl. Where can I get the necessary "stuff" for Apache 2.0. I
don't see it on the modssl, openssl or Apache web sites. I need to get ssl
up on Apache on Windows 2000.
Chuck
I can't find it, it supposed to be under httpd-2.0/modules, but i can't
find.
Has it not been release yet ?
Regards
Fredrik Lindstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dunenets.net
__
Apache Interface
14 matches
Mail list logo
