searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Hi all, has anyone out there successfully build a Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl openssl for windows NT? please give me a URL for such a binary. Currently there is only a non-ssl-version: apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/#stable

searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Hi all, has anyone out there successfully build a Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl openssl for windows NT? please give me a URL for such a binary. Currently there is only a non-ssl-version: apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/#stable

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Andrew Lietzow
Johannes, RE:Before I try further to compile the stuff by my own ... RE:Currently there is only a non-ssl-version: apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/#stable This version is only available at present in a -no_ssl

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Johannes Artur Bertscheit wrote: and I tried to compile the soruces with Visual C++ 6.0 without success (strange compilation errors occured). Which errors? You do realize that you need sed installed to compile it, right? See http://apr.apache.org/compiling_win32.html

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Andrew Lietzow wrote: 001a01c1e6f8$779c62a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Can't tell you much about a binary for NT. That's probably quite low on themarketing development list as there are not too manyApaches running on NT. Apache 2.0 is annouced to work on windows NT - including SSL: "This

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Dwayne Miller
There was a problem with the SSL code released with 2.0.35. I'd wait for 2.0.36 as it has been fixed there. I believe also that someone was testing the Windows Installer setup for 2.0.x. Maybe on the next round, SSL will be installed and you can configure them post installation... Johannes