Re: shmcb access violation with openssl 0.9.6i

2003-03-19 Thread Edward Wong
EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: shmcb access violation with openssl 0.9.6i Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:16:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mc9-f11.bay6.hotmail.com ([65.54.166.18]) by mc9-s7.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:47:14 -0800 Received: from

shmcb access violation with openssl 0.9.6i

2003-03-18 Thread WONG,ED (HP-Boise,ex1)
Hello All, I've been able to consistantly reproduce a GPF on Apache service shutdown using Openssl 0.9.6i, and Apache 2.0.44. Swapping to an older version of Openssl (0.9.6g) resolved the GPF. To reproduce, simply download and build OpenSSL 0.9.6i and Apache 2.0.44. Be sure to configure ssl to u

Re: shmcb access violation with openssl 0.9.6i

2003-03-04 Thread Cliff Woolley
I've passed this on to the apache dev list. --Cliff On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Edward Wong wrote: > Hello All, > > I've been able to consistantly reproduce a GPF on Apache service shutdown > using Openssl 0.9.6i, and Apache 2.0.44. > > Swapping to an older version of Openssl (0.9.6g) resolved the GP

shmcb access violation with openssl 0.9.6i

2003-03-04 Thread Edward Wong
Hello All, I've been able to consistantly reproduce a GPF on Apache service shutdown using Openssl 0.9.6i, and Apache 2.0.44. Swapping to an older version of Openssl (0.9.6g) resolved the GPF. To reproduce, simply download and build OpenSSL 0.9.6i and Apache 2.0.44. Be sure to configure ssl t