Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-17 Thread arcean

-- Original Message --
 I guess this is what you're looking for:
 http://www.modssl.org/contrib/Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip

I'm somewhat confused.
I downloaded and uncompressed the above archive, uncompressed and  was delighted to 
find that mod_ssl was present in the modules 
 directory.

But I couldn't find any openssl.exe and, from what I gather, I 
 need this

www.openssl.org/download/win32 ?? :)
 
executable/toolkit to generate a key pair and CSR?
I'm a bit new to web server security and have just had 
responsibility
thrust upon me, so I thank you all for your patience :)

Kind regards,
Brendan Lloyd



__
D O T E A S Y - Join the web hosting revolution!
 http://www.doteasy.com
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-17 Thread Brendan Lloyd

Guillaume wrote::
  I guess this is what you're looking for:
  
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip

Brendan replied:
  I'm somewhat confused.
  I downloaded and uncompressed the above archive, uncompressed and
  was delighted to find that mod_ssl was present in the modules 
  directory. But I couldn't find any openssl.exe [...]

arcean followed with:
 www.openssl.org/download/win32 ?? :)

As notified yesterday I've found what I needed. My point was
that I couldn't find the openssl.exe in the
Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip archive,
so I had to download it separately.

Kind regards,
Brendan
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-16 Thread Alex Moon

Could the mirror sites not host ssl enabled version as they are not 
in the US as they are in the Uk, Austrailia etc?

On 16 Jul 02, at 0:50, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brendan Lloyd wrote:
 
  And last but not least: can anyone clarify what the state of Apache
  2.0 is with regards to OpenSSL/mod_ssl? I've read in some places that
  Apache 2.0 supports/includes these, but then when I went to download
  the Windows binary distribution it had the suffix no_ssl?
 
 Source distributions of Apache 2.0 include mod_ssl.  Binary distributions
 are a different story, but only because of ambiguities surrounding the
 (IMHO silly) export restrictions of the US government.  We know we're
 allowed to export *source* for strong encryption software... but whether
 we're able to legally distribute *binaries* of strong encryption software
 is unclear.  So we don't.
 
 Of course, that's more of a burden on our Windows users than on our Unix
 users, since the former tend to rely on binaries and the latter tend to
 roll their own since they tend to have the compilation tools on hand.
 
 The solution, as has been pointed out, is that somebody outside the US
 contributed binaries for mod_ssl for Apache 2.0 on Win32 and uploaded them
 to www.modssl.org/contrib, which is physically located in Germany, as
 opposed to www.apache.org, which is physically located in the western US.
 
 Sigh.
 
 --Cliff
 
 __
 Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
 User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Technical Manager
Online Learning Support Unit
Middlesex University Business School

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
020 8411 5092

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-16 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Alex Moon wrote:

 Could the mirror sites not host ssl enabled version as they are not
 in the US as they are in the Uk, Austrailia etc?

The way our mirroring system works, the mirrors do an rsync of
www.apache.org/dist.  So they can't have files on their sites that aren't
on the main sites (or at least not for long), since rsync would delete
those files.

Additionally, it requires somebody outside the US do actually do the
compiling and uploading -- and all our Win32 guys (who are committers and
thus allowed to create official binaries) are in the US.  :-/

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-16 Thread Guillaume Filion

At 00:50 -0400 16/07/02, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brendan Lloyd wrote:

  And last but not least: can anyone clarify what the state of Apache
  2.0 is with regards to OpenSSL/mod_ssl? I've read in some places that
  Apache 2.0 supports/includes these, but then when I went to download
  the Windows binary distribution it had the suffix no_ssl?

Source distributions of Apache 2.0 include mod_ssl.  Binary distributions
are a different story, but only because of ambiguities surrounding the
(IMHO silly) export restrictions of the US government.  We know we're
allowed to export *source* for strong encryption software... but whether
we're able to legally distribute *binaries* of strong encryption software
is unclear.  So we don't.

Of course, that's more of a burden on our Windows users than on our Unix
users, since the former tend to rely on binaries and the latter tend to
roll their own since they tend to have the compilation tools on hand.

The solution, as has been pointed out, is that somebody outside the US
contributed binaries for mod_ssl for Apache 2.0 on Win32 and uploaded them
to www.modssl.org/contrib, which is physically located in Germany, as
opposed to www.apache.org, which is physically located in the western US.

Sigh.

Those interested in details on this legal stuff can see this site: 
http://www.bxa.doc.gov/Encryption/

What is nice with this policy update is that source code is now 
considered unrestricted (like Cliff said):
-
Also for the first time, all encryption source code that would be 
considered publicly available under Section 734.3(b)(3) of the EAR 
(such as source code posted to the Internet) and the corresponding 
object code may be exported and reexported under License Exception 
TSU -- Technology and Software Unrestricted (specifically, Section 
740.13(e) of the EAR), once notification (or a copy of the source 
code) is provided to BIS and the ENC Encryption Request Coordinator. 
See Note. Even if a license fee or royalty is charged for commercial 
production or sale of products developed using the source code, such 
source code is eligible for license exception TSU and no post-export 
reporting is required.
-
The complete content of the Export Administration Regulation (EAR) is 
available at: http://w3.access.gpo.gov/bis/ear/ear_data.html
Disclamer: reading the content of the EAR may cause an headache. 8)

It looks like binaries made from publically available source code are 
still considered unrestricted. They explicitly say [publically 
available source code] and the corresponding object code may be 
exported and reexported under License Exception TSU.

But the License Exception TSU states:
-
(2)  Provisions and Destinations.

(i)  Provisions.  Operation software may be exported or
reexported provided that both of the following conditions
are met:

(A)  The operation software is the minimum
necessary to operate equipment authorized for
export or reexport; and

(B)  The operation software is in object code.
-
mod_ssl is not the minimum necessary to operate equipment since 
it's an add-on module; Apache can work without mod_ssl. And part B 
totally confused me, it says that ONLY object code can be exported...

I guess Apache's official policy is let's not take chance. That 
sucks... Couldn't they hire a legal advisor that could sort this out?

Or easier, can't we just give a call to the BXA and ask them Do 
object code made from publically available source-code still falls 
under the License Exception TSU?, that would clear up the 
question... We could ask them for a signed letter, and if we get 
problems in the future, we could just show the letter and say that we 
did our homework.

Ok, putting everything on modssl.org/contrib is MUCH MUCH easier.

GFK's
-- 
Guillaume Filion
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/  (this will redirect)
PGP Fingerprint: 14A6 720A F7BA 6C87 2331 33FD 467E 9198 3DED D5CA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-16 Thread Brendan Lloyd

I wrote:
 My situation is like Ike's: I too need to install mod_ssl and Open_SSL
 (ie. require secure web transaction capabilities) [on a Windows machine]
 is there a site from which I can download precompiled versions of (or
 an installation Wizard for) the above?

Guillaume replied:
 I guess this is what you're looking for:
 http://www.modssl.org/contrib/Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip

I'm somewhat confused.

I downloaded and uncompressed the above archive, uncompressed and was
delighted to find that mod_ssl was present in the modules directory.

But I couldn't find any openssl.exe and, from what I gather, I need this
executable/toolkit to generate a key pair and CSR?

I'm a bit new to web server security and have just had responsibility
thrust upon me, so I thank you all for your patience :)

Kind regards,
Brendan Lloyd


   I n f o r m a t i o n   S y s t e m s   A n a l y s t
Wollongong UniCentre  PO BOX U100  University of Wollongong NSW 2522
 (02) 4221-8022   fax: (02) 4221-8026   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-16 Thread Brendan Lloyd

Brendan wrote:
  I downloaded and uncompressed the above archive, uncompressed and was
  delighted to find that mod_ssl was present in the modules directory.
 
  But I couldn't find any openssl.exe and, from what I gather, I need this
  executable/toolkit to generate a key pair and CSR?
 
  I'm a bit new to web server security and have just had responsibility
  thrust upon me, so I thank you all for your patience :)

Thanks all, everything now solved (thanks in large part to the realisation
that all the stuff needed is under http://www.modssl.org/contrib AND the
help of a kind soul named Mark Anderson in Queensland Australia).

Thanks again  kind regards,
Brendan Lloyd
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-15 Thread Brendan Lloyd

Hi all,

I am a new member to this group. I have a question which was asked on
2002-06-07 by Ike Ikonne (for which I could not locate any answer in
the list archives) so please forgive me for the repetition...

My situation is like Ike's: I too need to install mod_ssl and Open_SSL
(ie. require secure web transaction capabilities), with questions as
follows:

* How can I build OpenSSL and mod_ssl on NT or 2000 (ie. do I have to
  buy compiler software)?

* Alternatively, is there a sitfrom which I can download precompiled
  versions of (or an installation Wizard for) the above?

Please advise,
Thanks and kind regards,
Brendan Lloyd
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-15 Thread Guillaume Filion

At 16:42 +1000 15/07/02, Brendan Lloyd wrote:
I am a new member to this group. I have a question which was asked on
2002-06-07 by Ike Ikonne (for which I could not locate any answer in
the list archives) so please forgive me for the repetition...

My situation is like Ike's: I too need to install mod_ssl and Open_SSL
(ie. require secure web transaction capabilities), with questions as
follows:

* How can I build OpenSSL and mod_ssl on NT or 2000 (ie. do I have to
   buy compiler software)?

Yes you can, but you'll need to buy MS Visual C++ to compile Apache.

Instructions are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/windows.html
http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32

I guess you'll prefer to use the precompiled version avaiable below.

* Alternatively, is there a sitfrom which I can download precompiled
   versions of (or an installation Wizard for) the above?

I guess this is what you're looking for:
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip

Hope this helps,
GFK's
-- 
Guillaume Filion
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/  (this will redirect)
PGP Fingerprint: 14A6 720A F7BA 6C87 2331 33FD 467E 9198 3DED D5CA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-15 Thread Brendan Lloyd

Guillaume wrote:
 Yes you can, but you'll need to buy MS Visual C++ to compile Apache.
 Instructions are available at:
 http://httpd.apache.org/docs/windows.html
 http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32

I note that the modssl install instructions are out of date (as are
the versions of required software referenced). For example, the CygWin
version has been deprecated since about 1998!

 I guess you'll prefer to use the precompiled version avaiable below.

Yes, absolutely!

 * Alternatively, is there a sitfrom which I can download precompiled
versions of (or an installation Wizard for) the above?

 I guess this is what you're looking for:
 http://www.modssl.org/contrib/Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip

Eureka! I LOVE u, Guillaume Thank you s much!

Much relieved,
Brendan
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mod_SSL for Windows 2000/NT/XP

2002-07-15 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brendan Lloyd wrote:

 And last but not least: can anyone clarify what the state of Apache
 2.0 is with regards to OpenSSL/mod_ssl? I've read in some places that
 Apache 2.0 supports/includes these, but then when I went to download
 the Windows binary distribution it had the suffix no_ssl?

Source distributions of Apache 2.0 include mod_ssl.  Binary distributions
are a different story, but only because of ambiguities surrounding the
(IMHO silly) export restrictions of the US government.  We know we're
allowed to export *source* for strong encryption software... but whether
we're able to legally distribute *binaries* of strong encryption software
is unclear.  So we don't.

Of course, that's more of a burden on our Windows users than on our Unix
users, since the former tend to rely on binaries and the latter tend to
roll their own since they tend to have the compilation tools on hand.

The solution, as has been pointed out, is that somebody outside the US
contributed binaries for mod_ssl for Apache 2.0 on Win32 and uploaded them
to www.modssl.org/contrib, which is physically located in Germany, as
opposed to www.apache.org, which is physically located in the western US.

Sigh.

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]