Hi
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jeffrey jeffreykeg...@jeffreykegler.comwrote:
As far as I can tell
the actual behavior of Module::Build would be more in accord with the
following:
Modules listed in this section are necessary to build and install the
given module. If a listed module is
* Jeffrey jeffreykeg...@jeffreykegler.com [2010-03-22 00:50]:
@Aristotle: Your two one-syllable answers were very useful.
I realised afterwards that the mail reads somewhat gruff rather
than (as intended) amused. Sorry.
An obstacle for me was that Module::Build's actual behavior
seems to
# from Jeffrey
# on Saturday 20 March 2010 20:32:
An obstacle for me was that Module::Build's actual behavior seems to
contradict the documentation in Module::Build::API, which says of
'build_requires' that
Modules listed in this section are necessary to build and install the
given module, but
For quite some time I've created modules for internal use and I don't bother
with h2xs anymore for non-xs modules and I just copy-n-paste some existing
Makefile.PL I have from another package. As a result of some choice a while
back all my modules use Module::Install.
I guess I like the
For the modules I put on CPAN, I use ExtUtils::MakeMaker/Makefile.PL
because it is universally installed on all Perl versions that I
support, and I have not found a need to migrate to something else.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:35:56 -0700, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
So, I'm curious. Is there any kid of consensus on what to use for new
modules and why?
No. The closest is don't use MakeMaker, but even that's something people
will still argue about.
hdp.
On Mar 22, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:
No. The closest is don't use MakeMaker, but even that's something people
will still argue about.
And for module starting you have both Module::Starter and Dist::Zilla.
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.theworkinggeek.com =
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
So, I'm curious. Is there any kid of consensus on what to use for new
modules and why? Or is it still mostly a matter of opinion?
It's completely a matter of opinion. Schwern, who maintains
ExtUtils::MakeMaker, has said in
Le lundi 22 mars 2010 20:50:51, David Golden a écrit :
Module::Install gives EU::MM a friendlier interface -- I'd
even say a new lease on life -- at the cost of increased complexity
from its black box and the risk that you, as a distribution the
author, might have to re-release everything if a
Speaking also as a Debian packager, and notwithstanding Dominique's
comments that we dislike Module::Install, I'd like to provide some
additional clarification:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Dumont domi.dum...@free.fr wrote:
Module::Install raises a lot of problems downstream. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
