* Chris Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-07 03:35]:
Or perhaps the URL should be the key?
That sounds like the best idea to me, in fact. Pick a bunch of
stable URIs and tell people that those are the known ones. (But
allow any URI so people can use any weird crud they want. Not
because
in declaring licenses in CPAN modules.
That is also a good idea, of course.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
* Barbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-06 11:35]:
(Spec 1.4) [required] {map} The license(s) under which this
distribution may be used and redistributed, using a YAML
mapping to describe the version and the file or url containing
the full text of the license. For a full list of acknowledged
On Jun 6, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Barbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-06 11:35]:
(Spec 1.4) [required] {map} The license(s) under which this
distribution may be used and redistributed, using a YAML
mapping to describe the version and the file or url containing
the full
* Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-04T04:50:51]
- Each distro should have a META.yml and a license field in it for machines to
check the license. (this one is probably not a legal requirement but it will
help the various automated tools)
The license field in the META.yml is
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- CPAN distributions should have a LICEN[CS]E file
with the exact text of the license in it
Dual licensed modules are not accommodated for by a single file. The
GPL and Artistic license seem to have normative filenames like
I know most of you don't want to think about this or don't care at all
but others do.
So I'd like to clean things up a bit in the way CPAN modules are licensed.
Let's think about it as a necessary evil...
While I respect the right of everyone writing whatever they want as license
I would like to
On 06/04/2008 01:50:51 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
I know most of you don't want to think about this or don't care at
all
but others do.
So I'd like to clean things up a bit in the way CPAN modules are
licensed.
Let's think about it as a necessary evil...
While I respect the right of everyone
# from Gabor Szabo
# on Wednesday 04 June 2008 01:50:
- Each distro should have a META.yml and a license field in it for
machines to check the license. (this one is probably not a legal
requirement but it will help the various automated tools)
This (alone) might be legally sufficient, as it
