On 04/23/2014 08:42 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
In case you are not reading blogs.perl.org,
brian d foy just sent out the regular spring cleaning call:
http://blogs.perl.org/users/brian_d_foy/2014/04/lets-delete-1-files-from-cpan.html
We're a month into spring and some of the world just
Hi David,
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:16:56 -0700
David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com wrote:
On 04/23/2014 08:42 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
In case you are not reading blogs.perl.org,
brian d foy just sent out the regular spring cleaning call:
Hey y'all,
I had sent a private message to bdfoy about this, but he suggested I
present it to the list to be discussed.
On the aforementioned blog post, Ether mentions an interesting case where
old releases by other authors are obviously not cleaned up. Specifically,
I'm interested in the case
While potentially simplistic in its ideal, I can't help but think this
could and should be a democratic process; folk nominate examples like
GMPASSOS's old work, there's a rebuttal period, and then others vote on it
in search of critical thought and mass. Poof.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:44 AM,
This problem bothers me too. +1 to any process we might be able to put in place.
On Apr 25, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Joshua Turcotte joshua.eric.turco...@gmail.com
wrote:
While potentially simplistic in its ideal, I can't help but think this could
and should be a democratic process; folk nominate
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:16:56AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
1. I doubt the people whose systems depend upon those disappearing CPAN
distributions will find it to be fun. That's not a nice thing to do to
people, and it's going to create negative reactions for Perl, CPAN, and
FOSS.
David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com wrote:
... What is needed is way to take the best results
of TIMTOWTDI and unify them into a coherent programming systems
product [1]. Has anyone seen an effective way to do this?
On 04/25/2014 12:53 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
There's
