I raised this on this list a month ago, with a number of comments recieved.
I'm getting close to initial release, but there has been some internal
discussion about the name internally here.
As a result of the internal discussion, I'm down to two choices for the name:
Choice 1:
HPCI - high
What about HPC::?
BTW, we have SGE at work too so this seems very interesting :-)
Cheers!
Alex
: September 5, 2014 9:47 AM
To: John Macdonald
Cc: James E Keenan; module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
Yup, I agree. I think Cluster is too generic and can mean a lot of things (I
think of cluster analysis myself). Maybe something more distinctive
Sep 2014 13:47:26
To: John Macdonaldjohn.macdon...@oicr.on.ca
Cc: James E Keenanjk...@verizon.net;
module-authors@perl.orgmodule-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
Yup, I agree. I think Cluster is too generic and can mean a lot of things (I
think of cluster
-authors@perl.org
module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
Yup, I agree. I think Cluster is too generic and can mean a lot of things
(I think of cluster analysis myself). Maybe something more distinctive?
Is it application- or domain-specific (bioinformatics
On 09/04/2014 10:23 AM, John Macdonald wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to get general comment/concensus about a top level name that I
am proposing.
I'm starting to organize a set of modules for managing jobs on a
computer cluster. I intend it to work much like DBI - with a top level
abstract interface
, conclusions or other
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.
From: James E Keenan [jk...@verizon.net]
Sent: September 5, 2014 7:25 AM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
On 09/04
: Alex Muntada [alex.munt...@gmail.com]
Sent: September 5, 2014 9:04 AM
To: John Macdonald
Cc: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
What about HPC::?
BTW, we have SGE at work too so this seems very interesting :-)
Cheers!
Alex
: September 5, 2014 9:47 AM
To: John Macdonald
Cc: James E Keenan; module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
Yup, I agree. I think Cluster is too generic and can mean a lot of things (I
think of cluster analysis myself). Maybe something more distinctive
not be that of the organization.
--
*From:* Alex Muntada [alex.munt...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* September 5, 2014 9:04 AM
*To:* John Macdonald
*Cc:* module-authors@perl.org
*Subject:* Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
What about HPC::?
BTW, we have SGE at work too so this seems
not be that of the organization.
From: Dana Hudes [dhu...@hudes.org]
Sent: September 5, 2014 10:03 AM
To: John Macdonald
Cc: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
So you intend to develop a new pure Perl compute cluster
5, 2014 10:03 AM
To: John Macdonald
Cc: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
So you intend to develop a new pure Perl compute cluster? Because if you just
need to get the job done why would you not use Hadoop whether private cluster
or AWS? It has
...@hudes.org; module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster
Probably way off-topic but just a question: should a generic interface target
something like DRMAA?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRMAA
That would work across most clusters as it’s a single unified API
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, James E Keenan wrote:
Could that be shortened to simply: Cluster ?
If this happens I'm claiming Cluster::Fu... well, I think you know where I'm
going with this ;-)
--Arthur Corliss
Live Free or Die
14 matches
Mail list logo
