Re: ship it

2008-07-16 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 16 Jul 2008, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Take for example report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271. How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere. Maybe it's some Tes

Re: ship it

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:10:20 -0500, "Ken Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Take for example >>> report http://www

Re: ship it

2008-07-15 Thread Ken Williams
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Take for example >> report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271. > > How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Aut

Re: ship it

2008-07-15 Thread Ken Williams
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Take for example > report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271. How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere. Maybe it's some Test:: module barfing? -Ken

Re: ship it

2008-07-15 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:10:35 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module-Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz > As soon as enough people feel confident that nothing has been completely > broken? > Any testers want to run a few weeks worth of

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread John Peacock
Eric Wilhelm wrote: The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type publish_module and ship Module::Build. 0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between whenever the heck it last shipped and now. At what point would it be prudent to call it a rel

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 10, 2008, at 01:10, Eric Wilhelm wrote: Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break? http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module- Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz As soon as enough people feel confident that nothing has been completely broken? With this version in

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread David Golden
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any chance we could use a transfer protocol other than e-mail? Was > there some progress on an HTTP POST mechanism for this? Yes, actually, that's a good idea. Test::Reporter::Transport::HTTPGateway -- it was intended to

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 10, 2008, at 01:10, Eric Wilhelm wrote: Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break? http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module- Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz Those references to 0.2808_03 in API.pm should be changed to 0.2808_02. Best, David

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from David Golden # on Thursday 10 July 2008 04:23: >That said -- I'm not sure that hitting this list with a couple >thousand fail reports in a few days is tolerable...  :-) Right. Well our current smoke testing scheme is non-existent, so most things would be an improvement. >Maybe we can se

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread David Golden
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any testers want to run a few weeks worth of smokes against it? I'm not > sure if anyone is setup to do that. e.g. for any clean-smoke > environment - your smoker needs to install the alpha M::B when it sees > it as requir

Re: ship it

2008-07-10 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from David E. Wheeler # on Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:26: >> At what point would it be prudent to call it a release and kick it >> out the door? > >Tomorrow. ;-P But seriously, who makes this call? Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break? http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/

Re: ship it

2008-07-09 Thread Randy J. Ray
MSIE. MS.* -- """ Randy J. Ray Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ship it

2008-07-09 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 9, 2008, at 17:29, Eric Wilhelm wrote: The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type publish_module and ship Module::Build. 0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between whenever the heck it last shipped and now. Can we get _03 out now, p

Re: ship it

2008-07-09 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 9, 2008, at 18:47, Ron Savage wrote: Hi Eric Pick the odd one out :-): Everybody hates: o Module::Signature o Development-style version numbers o Thread implementations which don't work o XYZ implementations which don't work o Less than infinitely fast response times o MS Win2FK o MS Wi

Re: ship it

2008-07-09 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Eric Pick the odd one out :-): Everybody hates: o Module::Signature o Development-style version numbers o Thread implementations which don't work o XYZ implementations which don't work o Less than infinitely fast response times o MS Win2FK o MS WinXFP o MS WinFVista o Etc -- Ron Savage [EM

ship it

2008-07-09 Thread Eric Wilhelm
The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type publish_module and ship Module::Build. 0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between whenever the heck it last shipped and now. At what point would it be prudent to call it a release and kick it out t