Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread Gabor Szabo
Hi, http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Build/lib/Module/Build/API.pod lists 'mozilla' as mozilla 1.0 or mozilla1.1 I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is explicitely licensed under mozilla1.1 Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values of the licens

Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread David Golden
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is explicitely > licensed > under mozilla1.1 > > Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values > of the license field? > Software::License http://search.cpan.org/

Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:40 PM, David Golden wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: >> I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is explicitely >> licensed >> under mozilla1.1 >> >> Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values >> of

Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread David Golden
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > That's what I did but I expect some arguments from the core Bugzilla > developers > and their lawyers. I'll use your point if needed.  Thanks The license field in Module::Build just sets the same field in META.yml. If they don't like 'mozill

Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread Salve J Nilsen
David Golden said: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is explicitely licensed under mozilla1.1 Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values of the license field? Software::License http://searc

Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses

2010-03-27 Thread Christopher J. Madsen
On 3/27/2010 10:35 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote: > Nice. How about AGPL_v3? It's in there. > Is the draft spec available for review somewhere? :) Yes, on Github: http://github.com/dagolden/cpan-meta-spec/blob/master/META-spec.pod -- Chris Madsen p...@cjmw