[modwsgi] Re: Blog posts about mod_python, but also relevant to mod_wsgi.

2009-03-10 Thread pablo platt
Thank you very much for your detailed answers. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/3/10 pablo platt pablo.pl...@gmail.com: In mod_wsgi embedded mode, what is the difference between having one process with 50 threads and 5 processes

[modwsgi] mod_wsgi packages for solaris on http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

2009-03-10 Thread rupert.thurner
hi, if somebody is using mod_wsgi on solaris, there are now test packages for opencsw on http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html. rupert. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups modwsgi group. To post to

[modwsgi] mod_wsgi and trac plugins interfering in a strange way: see agilo

2009-03-10 Thread rupert.thurner
(why) could it be that mod_wsgi used for many trac instances, one enabled with agilo interferes? see: http://groups.google.com/group/agilo/browse_thread/thread/62d296608f871c1e rupert. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

[modwsgi] Re: mod_wsgi packages for solaris on http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

2009-03-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/3/11 rupert.thurner rupert.thur...@gmail.com: hi, if somebody is using mod_wsgi on solaris, there are now test packages for opencsw on http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html. Thanks, have made a link to the repository in wiki page about installation on Solaris. Graham

[modwsgi] Re: mod_wsgi and trac plugins interfering in a strange way: see agilo

2009-03-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/3/11 rupert.thurner rupert.thur...@gmail.com: (why) could it be that mod_wsgi used for many trac instances, one enabled with agilo interferes? see: http://groups.google.com/group/agilo/browse_thread/thread/62d296608f871c1e Seems there has been a followup to say it was a known agilo

[modwsgi] mod_wsgi.c:5230: warning: passing argume nt 1 of ‘PySys_AddWarnOption’ from incompatible pointe r type

2009-03-10 Thread gert
r...@r12276:~/mod_wsgi# svn update Umod_wsgi.c Updated to revision 1226. r...@r12276:~/mod_wsgi# CFLAGS=-O2 ./configure --with-python=/usr/ bin/python3.1 --with-apxs=/usr/httpd/bin/apxs checking Apache version... 2.2.11 configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile

[modwsgi] Re: mod_wsgi.c:5230: warning: passing ar gument 1 of ‘PySys_AddWarnOption’ from incompatible po inter type

2009-03-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Bugger. I thought I checked what Python 3.X did. Seemed then went to using wide characters even for command line option parsing. :-( Thanks. Graham 2009/3/11 gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com: r...@r12276:~/mod_wsgi# svn update U    mod_wsgi.c Updated to revision 1226. r...@r12276:~/mod_wsgi#

[modwsgi] Re: mod_wsgi.c:5230: warning: passing ar gument 1 of ‘PySys_AddWarnOption’ from incompatible po inter type

2009-03-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
BTW, this is all because of the change: http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/issues/detail?id=137 Graham 2009/3/11 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com: Bugger. I thought I checked what Python 3.X did. Seemed then went to using wide characters even for command line option parsing. :-(

[modwsgi] Re: Should mod_wsgi support X-Sendfile itself for WSGI applications?

2009-03-10 Thread Nimrod A. Abing
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote: The question is, should mod_wsgi itself provide support for X-Sendfile response header for just WSGI applications to make it easier if you want to use this feature? My feeling is that it shouldn't, but there

[modwsgi] Re: Should mod_wsgi support X-Sendfile itself for WSGI applications?

2009-03-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/3/11 Nimrod A. Abing nimrod.ab...@gmail.com: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote: The question is, should mod_wsgi itself provide support for X-Sendfile response header for just WSGI applications to make it easier if you want to use this