On 03-09-2008, Mic Pringle wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to use mod_wsgi to implement a shared hosting scheme for
Django and was wondering if it was possible to set a limit/cap on the
memory used by each daemon child process, so that if one Django apps
starts sucking up all available memory it
On 03-09-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2008/9/4 Mic Pringle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm looking to use mod_wsgi to implement a shared hosting scheme for
Django and was wondering if it was possible to set a limit/cap on the
memory used by each daemon child process, so that if one Django
On 25-09-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
[...]
This is why I see the fork of setuptools being interesting. That is,
someone else has got frustrated enough with something else produced by
I just read that there is an other one :
On 28-09-2008, ianmendiola wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that while developing a web application using mod_wsgi
some of the changes I make don't appear on the first refresh. For
instance if I had a page that displayed, Hello World and wanted to
change it to Hello Universe. I'd only see the
Hi,
In daemon mode, with threads=1 :
def application(environ, start_response):
status = '200 OK'
output = con= %s % cgi.escape(repr(pool.connection()))
loc = threading.local()
try:
loc.i += 1
except AttributeError:
loc.i = 0
output = 'i=%s' % loc.i
Maybe more clear :
#!/usr/bin/python
import cgi
import threading
import sys
import os
class MyLoc(threading.local):
def __init__(self):
print sys.stderr , 'init'
myloc = MyLoc()
def application(environ, start_response):
status = '200 OK'
myloc.i = 0
print sys.stderr,
I'll look if i can reproduce this with the code of _threading_local
With _threading_local it works (python implementation)
import _threading_local
class MyLoc(_threading_local.local):
[Fri Oct 03 11:47:08 2008] [error] init
[Fri Oct 03 11:47:08 2008] [error] pid: 2091 id: 3067888900
On 06-10-2008, gert wrote:
On Oct 6, 10:33 am, gert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 6, 10:18 am, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/10/6 gert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Failed requests: 9993 But I did have 1564.21 requests per second
doh :-)
On 06-10-2008, William Dode wrote:
...
The only problem is that there is not a lot of db pool utilities and
dbutils is one of the most famous...
I reported the problem on the dbutils list
--
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net
Informaticien Indépendant
On 04-10-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
BTW, if I am right, you would see the behaviour you expect to see if you use:
WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}
More or less, it give me alternatively two differents local instances...
But i'm agree with your analyze, that to use threading.local is not
On 06-10-2008, William Dode wrote:
On 06-10-2008, William Dode wrote:
...
The only problem is that there is not a lot of db pool utilities and
dbutils is one of the most famous...
I reported the problem on the dbutils list
DBUtils 1.0rc1 now works with mod_wsgi :-)
--
William Dodé
Hi,
i've a little virtual server with few websites with very low traffics
and one website with more traffic (10 hits/day). Most of the time it
works very very well, very fast, without using too much memory...
But sometimes the load goes very high, i don't know why, i imagine that
it's
On 28-11-2008, Nimrod A. Abing wrote:
Do you have KeepAlive on? If so how many seconds is your
KeepAliveTimeout? Would also help to know what OS you're running and
how much memory you have on your server.
MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
KeepAliveTimeout 15
The os is debian lenny, the server has
On 28-11-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2008/11/29 William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
i've a little virtual server with few websites with very low traffics
and one website with more traffic (10 hits/day). Most of the time it
works very very well, very fast, without using too much
Hi,
I found something strange on an app wich run under deamon process
[Mon Dec 22 06:45:27 2008] [info] mod_wsgi (pid=14608): Create interpreter
'xxx.flibuste.net|/cde/serv_cde.wsgi'.
[Mon Dec 22 06:45:27 2008] [info] mod_wsgi (pid=14608): Adding
'/home/web/xxx/pynclude' to path.
[Mon Dec 22
On 22-12-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2008/12/23 William Dode w...@flibuste.net:
On 22-12-2008, William Dode wrote:
k
Hi,
I found something strange on an app wich run under deamon process
[Mon Dec 22 06:45:27 2008] [info] mod_wsgi (pid=14608): Create interpreter
'xxx.flibuste.net
Hi,
I switched an app to multithread. Now i would like to know how many
threads was used simultaneously. For two reasons. To know if i really
need multithread and if yes how many thread i must configure. Thought
i know that i should not choose the minimum...
Is there an easy way to do this ?
On 02-01-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/1/2 William Dode w...@flibuste.net:
The bug with which memory pool was used, potentially meant that stuff
like the value of the python-path option was stored in memory which
had been released. When that memory would be reused would be a bit
random
On 03-01-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/1/3 William Dode w...@flibuste.net:
On 02-01-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/1/3 William Dode w...@flibuste.net:
Hi,
I switched an app to multithread. Now i would like to know how many
threads was used simultaneously. For two reasons
Hi,
I still have somes problems with somes apps that i cannot resolv. They
are not related to mod_wsgi because when i use mod_proxy they hang also.
There is something about io i think... Very difficult to catch because
it's happend not often, one time each week on one server, one time each
On 12-01-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/1/12 William Dode w...@flibuste.net:
Hi,
I still have somes problems with somes apps that i cannot resolv. They
are not related to mod_wsgi because when i use mod_proxy they hang also.
There is something about io i think... Very difficult
On 23-03-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
So, may be time to finally look at Mercurial since they have already
given me instructions on how to convert mod_wsgi over. :-)
+1
Mercurial + mod_wsgi are working very well together. I use it for all of
my projects, even with few contributor it's very
On 23-03-2009, Michael Schurter wrote:
+1 for bzr
Honestly I really don't care, just felt someone needed to stand up for
the other main competing DVCS. :-)
I was a fan of bzr till i tried mercurial, the same but faster and
simpler. Did you tried it ?
--
William Dodé -
On 27-03-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
I know this is off topic for this list, but in looking at code
autoreloading options for mod_wsgi, the question arose in my mind as
to what Ruby on Rails and similar for Ruby do to handle the issue of
code changes made to live application. Do they have
On 09-05-2009, gert wrote:
Whohoo :-)
if it's not enough
http://hg-git.github.com/
--
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net
Informaticien Indépendant
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
modwsgi
Hi,
I did a web service, called from a php script. It's wsgi compliant.
Now i wonder wich server i should take. Since the php script and my app
runs on the same machine, i don't need apache for this, the php script
call my app directly by localhost:.
But if i run my app under mod_wsgi i
On 06-06-2009, gert wrote:
On Jun 5, 11:00 am, William Dode w...@flibuste.net wrote:
Hi,
I did a web service, called from a php script. It's wsgi compliant.
Now i wonder wich server i should take. Since the php script and my app
runs on the same machine, i don't need apache
On 24-07-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
This project isn't exactly one where many
people are working on it, so it is not like it brings any needed
features.
I think there are a lot of people working on/with it that you don't see.
mod_wsgi is a critical piece of software, it serve websites !
On 06-08-2009, Damjan wrote:
Not very well.
We are having another argument about WSGI specification and Python 3.0
at the moment on Python WEB-SIG list. The discussion seems to have
exploded over night and have about 30 messages to read about it yet.
If some sort of resolution isn't
29 matches
Mail list logo
