On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:07:43AM -0400, David Nolan wrote:
Plus the complete lack of any non-development releases on Mon for almost 3
years makes me a bit wary of spending large amounts of effort on rewriting
the internals on Mon. Especially since all of the patches I've previously
Thats too bad cause I'd think more people would find it a useful feature, no?
knowing that, is there any way to force mon to give me that info? I'm assuming one way
is to have hostgroups with only one host in them? Can alert scripts be written that
run whenever a single host (within a group)
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Ed Ravin wrote:
to other developers. I know I've submitted several improvements
to the monitor scripts in recent months and haven't gotten any feedback.
netapfree.monitor?
(0) uplift /home/trockij/mon/patches $ perl -c netappfree.monitor
Format not terminated at
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:30:06AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Ed Ravin wrote:
to other developers. I know I've submitted several improvements
to the monitor scripts in recent months and haven't gotten any feedback.
netapfree.monitor?
(0) uplift
attached is the diff -u between mon 0.99.2-6 and the version which
david nolan sent to me. if someone would like to merge them into the
most recent -devel version, test it all to be sure it works, and then
post their results, then i'm sure it would be appreciated.
this is a matter of historical
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:30 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-rw-r--r--1 536536 179923 Apr 23 13:37 mon-0.99.3-41.tar.gz
It might help if you made announcements about new dev versions being
available.
Have you started integrating any of the patches I've sent you
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jim Trocki wrote:
yeah, something's funny there. i saved the message by using the pipe
raw text command in pine then ran uudeview on it, and that's what i
got. in the raw message it has no --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q to terminate the
mime attachment.
i'll have a look at this one
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:52 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
gander at and do something with if they chose, he sent them only to me
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:02 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jim Trocki wrote:
yeah, something's funny there. i saved the message by using the pipe
raw text command in pine then ran uudeview on it, and that's what i
got. in the raw message it has no
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:02:22AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
wtf, the one you just sent has the same problem. maybe it's an mua
problem on your end?
Curiouser and curiouser. I don't have any problems with the message
from the mailing list that I received in my mailbox, so I don't think
my MUA
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
gander at and do something with if they chose, he sent them only to me
Sounds like he wanted
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:25 PM -0400 Ed Ravin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
gander at and do
12 matches
Mail list logo
