Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-30 Thread MenTaLguY
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 15:36 -0800, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > I have been talking with Eric Hodel about this and he had a > suggestion. Maybe instead of requiring that fastthread be required > before thread we should add the necessary Object.send :remove_const > calls to remove Thread

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-30 Thread Ezra Zygmuntowicz
On Dec 30, 2006, at 12:36 PM, MenTaLguY wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 01:42 -0500, Wilson Bilkovich wrote: >> I asked Eric Hodel about it, and he said it looked like the 'thread' >> requirement in rubygems was added accidentally. That was after >> only a >> few moments of contemplation, so it

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-30 Thread MenTaLguY
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 01:42 -0500, Wilson Bilkovich wrote: > I asked Eric Hodel about it, and he said it looked like the 'thread' > requirement in rubygems was added accidentally. That was after only a > few moments of contemplation, so it may turn out differently in the > long run. Any updates o

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-27 Thread Ezra Zygmuntowicz
On Dec 26, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: >> > > Er... you're using fastthread in rake? Could I ask what for? I suppose > rake isn't for long running tasks... Louis- I am not using fastthread directly for rake. But merb uses fastthread and I use rake to run the unit tests and r

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-26 Thread Wilson Bilkovich
On 12/27/06, MenTaLguY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 19:43 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote: > > I guess rubygems folks added thread part of rubygems now... something > > that isn't good at all (why I require thread if my application I don't > > use it?, just to say something). > > I d

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-26 Thread MenTaLguY
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 19:43 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote: > I guess rubygems folks added thread part of rubygems now... something > that isn't good at all (why I require thread if my application I don't > use it?, just to say something). I don't know... it seems reasonable if they need to do something

Re: [Mongrel] Rubygems 0.9.0.8 and Fastthread problem

2006-12-26 Thread Luis Lavena
On 12/26/06, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heya Folks- > > This is mainly for Zed and Mentalguy. I have been playing with the > new release of rubygems 0.9.0.8 and I have a major problem with the > requirement that fastthread needs to be required before thread. Just > requi