Re: [Mongrel] mongrel startup fails now: already initialized constant OPTIONS

2007-11-14 Thread Rafael G.
Evan Weaver escribió: Works for me. Do you have any strange gem_plugins installed? Maybe try uninstalling the old version of mongrel::cluster? Evan On Nov 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Stephen Bannasch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated to ruby 1.8.6p111 last night and updated some gems and now

[Mongrel] Best practice Ruby on Rails on Windows configuration

2007-11-14 Thread Benjamin van Eck
Hi, I have read many articles on the net today about configuring Ruby on Rails on a Windows server. But there doesn't seem to a one solution for all on how to configure a new Ruby on Rails server. So I can use some advise with this. I am using a Windows 2003 server and don't get many request a

Re: [Mongrel] Best practice Ruby on Rails on Windows configuration

2007-11-14 Thread Luis Lavena
On Nov 14, 2007 2:03 PM, Benjamin van Eck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have read many articles on the net today about configuring Ruby on Rails on a Windows server. But there doesn't seem to a one solution for all on how to configure a new Ruby on Rails server. So I can use some advise with

Re: [Mongrel] Best practice Ruby on Rails on Windows configuration

2007-11-14 Thread Ralf Vitasek
i don't really understand what you want to know. main focus is on optimizing the requests, instead of improving the amount of page requests that sounds more like code optimization in your rails app, when your app doesn't perform well enough you have to tweak your code or probably add

Re: [Mongrel] Best practice Ruby on Rails on Windows configuration

2007-11-14 Thread Ball, Donald A Jr (Library)
- If you're forced to IIS (Internet Information Server) it seems latest IIS7 support FastCGI, so using libfcgi and ruby-fcgi works out of the box I've tried out the FastCGI ISAPI module for IIS6 recently and still experienced no joy getting it to play nicely with rails. Do you happen to have

Re: [Mongrel] scripts installed

2007-11-14 Thread Evan Weaver
Ubuntu changed the way Rubygems is handled in version 7. This is an OS issue, not a Mongrel issue. Evan On Nov 14, 2007 4:10 PM, John Joseph Bachir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a debian production server and my os x development mcahine, there is a script at /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails On

[Mongrel] scripts installed

2007-11-14 Thread John Joseph Bachir
On a debian production server and my os x development mcahine, there is a script at /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails On an ubuntu 7.1 machine, this script appears at /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin/mongrel_rails mongrel was installed using gem in all cases. What is the cause of the discrepancy? Thanks,

Re: [Mongrel] scripts installed

2007-11-14 Thread Gunnar Wolf
John Joseph Bachir dijo [Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 04:10:35PM -0500]: On a debian production server and my os x development mcahine, there is a script at /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails On an ubuntu 7.1 machine, this script appears at /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin/mongrel_rails mongrel was installed

Re: [Mongrel] scripts installed

2007-11-14 Thread John Joseph Bachir
Thanks for the thoughts Gunnar. On Nov 14, 2007 5:02 PM, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest you don't use different package management systems - Either you handle _all_ of your Ruby modules and components (i.e. Mongrel) via Gems, or _all_ of them via dpkg. To be clear: I was, in