On 12.03.2013 00:16, Neale Ferguson wrote:
ObservableCollection was moved from Windows.Base to System and
TypeForwardedTo and TypeForwardedFrom tags were added to the relevant source
code. ObservableCollection is serializable but when done on a Windows system
using .NET = 3 the serialized
On 12.03.2013 10:47, Robert Jordan wrote:
In addition, Windows serializes a variable name _busyCount whereas Mono
defines _count.
Also, I note that BindingList serialization on Mono has different and
missing variable names compared to the .NET equivalent. For example,
allow_new is allowNew
On 12/03/13 11:08, David Schmitt wrote:
On 12.03.2013 10:47, Robert Jordan wrote:
In addition, Windows serializes a variable name _busyCount whereas
Mono
defines _count.
Also, I note that BindingList serialization on Mono has different and
missing variable names compared to the .NET
On 12.03.2013 13:43, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
On 12/03/13 11:08, David Schmitt wrote:
On 12.03.2013 10:47, Robert Jordan wrote:
In addition, Windows serializes a variable name _busyCount whereas
Mono
defines _count.
Also, I note that BindingList serialization on Mono has different and
Hi,
ObservableCollection was moved from Windows.Base to System and
TypeForwardedTo and TypeForwardedFrom tags were added to the relevant source
code. ObservableCollection is serializable but when done on a Windows system
using .NET = 3 the serialized object will still contain the WindowsBase,
