Alright, patch 11 is in
(https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/b6a687dfd9c88cb2b05fe6313ccbcae8051f6555).
The hardest part was trying to come up with a commit message. :p
Thanks.
I've encountered no failures with the OneClickComboBoxCell test in the form
that it exists in the git repo.
I'm guessing
Manos looks cool if you want to rebuild everything from scratch. But I will
need to use some web services and I may hit a wall there with it.
- Vladimir
From: Rafael Teixeira [mailto:mono...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:51 PM
To: Vladimir Dimitrov
Cc:
In doing some testing it looks like TCP_CORK is not being set by
default on ubuntu when dealing with async APIs for TCP.
I realized this by not seeing a perf difference when sending 20 byte
packets when setting NODELAY.
1) Is this by design for some reason?
2) Can this be bypassed? I didn't see
Hi,
I just wanted to make sure that the latest mono from the master branch is
STILL supposed to go with the mono/llvm fork on git-hub.
I other words... Am I doing it right?
I the mono + llvm on x64 still a viable option (I realize it's alpha quality
at best, I just want to know it's not
I did a build on the master with mono/llvm and compiled correctly. At the
time I was also confused about whether needed to look for a specific branch or
not.
As for abandon-ware, I hope not. Without LLVM, mono would not be viable for
me. As it is, even with LLVM, mono is still 2x
Hi,
Yes, if you want LLVM support, the way to get it is still to build
with github.com/mono/llvm/mono (that is, the mono branch, not the
master branch).
It's certainly not abandoned; we actively maintain it, and it's used
in Xamarin's MonoTouch product.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at
Thanks for the info Alex,
I am personally more interested on x64 and possible full AOT on LLVM on
x64, as I use it for an HPC scenario...
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Yes, if you want LLVM support, the way to get it is still to build
Full AOT produces worse code than with the regular JIT, so don't.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Dan Shechter d...@houmus.org wrote:
Thanks for the info Alex,
I am personally more interested on x64 and possible full AOT on LLVM on
x64, as I use it for an HPC scenario...
On Thu, Jun 21,
Rodrigo, Thanks for the comment.
I definitely noticed this when testing it out myself.
I'm looking for a way to do the LLVM as build-step on my build server so I
don't have to re-do it on each CPU on my HPC cluster when chunking up my
computational jobs...
Is there a decent way to do this, or
PS: there's this one you can close, too:
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5420
Steven Boswell II wrote
Enclosed is a bug fix for another issue I ran into with Mono's ComboBox,
where its behavior deviated from what .NET does. You can apply the
unit-test patch, watch it fail,
10 matches
Mail list logo
