Hello Mikhail,
Please file a bug report so we can properly track this issue.
http://bugzilla.xamarin.com
Miguel
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Mikhail Filippov
wrote:
> I found problem in Mono in named mutex I have repro program:
> using System;
> using
You should not do that.
You are replacing the code behind the scenes. You might as well poke
random values in memory.
On Unix, if you really cannot resist the urge of replacing a binary that is
in active use, you must first delete the file, then copy over.
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:18 AM,
Time the C calls, it is possible that close is flushing the data and is not
returning until that happebs
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:33 AM Jason Curl wrote:
> I've tested the latest snapshot of Mono and the problem remains:
>
> Mono JIT compiler version 4.5.0 (Nightly
>
>
> - Does MONO_THREADS_PER_CPU=1 control the number of threads created by
> sgen-gc implementation ? It does not seems so on my side.
>
This has not relationship to the GC, just to the system thread pool.
Miguel.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
No
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:33 AM, techi eth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to renew DHCP based IP address using System.Net.
>
> Techi
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
>
Hey,
My bad, I should have said "kill", not "signal" to send messages to other
processes.
Miguel.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 8:18 AM, techi eth wrote:
> > Thanks for quick hint.
> > We can receive signal
You call the "signal" API.
Mono wraps that conveniently for you in the Mono.Posix assembly:
Mono.Unix.Native.Stdlib.signal
Miguel
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:45 AM, techi eth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the way by which one process can send Unix Signal to another
> process.
>
Exactly.
We are not going to change this, but luckily the solution provided should
work for you.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jonathan Purdy
wrote:
> Since Git 1.6.6, HTTP(S) remotes are as efficient as the git/SSH
> protocols. However, SSH keys are more
Hello,
I posted some comments on the bug with some suggestions.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jacek Rużyczka
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> for a couple of weeks I've had a strange issue with Mono crashing with a
> native stacktrace, but with an empty managed code
>
>
> The mono class libraries are MIT licensed, so if you need to distribute
> those with your app, should be easy for you to comply. The mono runtime is
> GPL, so unless your app is GPL, you'll have a license conflict trying to
> distribute mono with your app legally.
>
LGPL, not GPL.
Miguel
You should package any libraries that are referenced by your applicaation,
and any that the libraries themselves reference.
monodis --assemblyref FOO.{exe,dll} would list that for you.
Miguel.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Rajesh Khan wrote:
> I have two issues.
>
>
there.
Miguel
On Friday, January 1, 2016, Jason Curl <jcurln...@arcor.de> wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-01 13:17, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
>> Re-reading your original question makes me wonder if you really need
>> something as heavy handed as the approach on Mono.Posix.
>>
>
t;
> Thank you very much and for giving me the opportunity to use Mono.
>
> Regards,
> Jason.
>
>
> On 2015-12-31 02:04, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> For something like libc, you can use an approach similar to what
> Mono.Posix does, where an intermediate C glue fi
For something like libc, you can use an approach similar to what Mono.Posix
does, where an intermediate C glue file acts as a bridge between the API
differences.
See the P/Invokes for the Mono.Posix assembly, and its supporting glue code
in mono/support/
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Jason
Hello,
The first step would be to isolate the root cause for the problem.
Once we have that information, from this email alone it is not possible to
determine what the culprit is.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Jonathan Channon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am deploying
Hello,
Oops, I posted with [INSERT EMAIL ADDRESS], for now both the monodevelop
and mono teams point to me.
But we will introduce some alias, as soon as I figure out how to send mail
to mono-project.com ;-)
Miguel.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@xamarin.com>
Hello Monoers,
Today we are adopting the following code of conduct for the Mono
project.
This comes from: http://contributor-covenant.org
Contributor Code of Conduct
As contributors and maintainers of this project, and in the interest of
fostering an open and welcoming community, we pledge to
onfig_parse_file_with_context (in
> /opt/plasticscm5/mono/bin/mono-sgen)
>
> ==4421==by 0x81B6FD6: mono_config_parse_file (in
> /opt/plasticscm5/mono/bin/mono-sgen)
>
> ==4421==by 0x81B808B: mono_config_parse (in
> /opt/plasticscm5/mono/bin/mono-sgen)
>
> ==4421==by
Hello Miguel,
I also had to apply this change in order to avoid an unallowed warning
> message:
>
> I: Statement might be overflowing a buffer in strncat. Common mistake:
>
>BAD: strncat(buffer,charptr,sizeof(buffer)) is wrong, it takes the
>
>left over size as 3rd argument
>
>GOOD:
Hello team,
We are very close to the C6 release, but we need your help to wrap things
up.
We are tracking about 34 issues to complete, Adrian will be following up
with some of you to get your patches tested, review bugs, look into
existing bugs, or check regressions. Some of the tasks just
They both work.
One is based on Mono 4.0 series, with minimal changes just to enable the
support on El Capitan; The 4.2 has the same changes, on top of the latest
Mono 4.2, available on Alpha and the release candidate.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Victor E.
Hello,
Yes, we are planning on shipping the 64 bit release.
It is necessary for Roslyn, because Roslyn consumes so much more memory
that large projects need to run on 64.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Greg Young wrote:
> As of now 32 bit mono is still being shipped
I believe the packages are already up on the web site
On Saturday, October 10, 2015, Numpsy wrote:
> I'm interested to know if there are any time frames for this as well - I'm
> currently working on a project that needs to use a 64bit Mono on OSX, and
> it
> would be
One option would be to write a backend that uses one of the various
configuration systems in Unix that use a separate process to arbitrate
access to the information.
Perhaps you can use dconf.
Since the registry lives in mscorlib, and this would bring a number of
dependencies , I recommend to
Hello,
It can be oversight, it can be lack of tests, it can be an implementation
that did not keep up with changes, or it can be something that was never
worked on.
Miguel.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Numpsy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> When trying to build some Windows
Sure, that works.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Numpsy wrote:
> Ok.
> Is it worth me doing a pull request to add a stub implementation? (Some of
> the other props there just throw NotImplementedException on call, so I can
> do the same).
>
> I've also found another
Hello,
We tried to make those work, and could not. That is why Mono's SHM
support is getting deprecated, it works most of the time, when things go
right. The problem is that things can go wrong, and they go wrong.
There are a universe of problems, ranging from the home directory being on
non
a libmono-profiler-iomap.la
> libMonoSupportW.a
> libmonoboehm-2.0.lalibmono-profiler-iomap.so
> libMonoSupportW.la
> libmonoboehm-2.0.solibmono-profiler-iomap.so.0
> libMonoSupportW.so
> libmonoboehm-2.0.so.1 libmono-profiler-iomap.so.0.0.0 mono
Hello,
I do not follow, what "new lib64" thing? That sounds like a packaging
issue, more than a Mono issue.
Miguel.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:44 PM, psant...@codicesoftware.com <
psant...@codicesoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're having trouble understanding the new lib64 thing in mono 4.3
It is an implementation choice.
Perhaps we could make this configurable, but more often than not, this
indicates a serious issue, and surfacing something so useful as a
AccessViolationException reduces the usefulness of the feature.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Raphael Boissel
some time)
>
> cheers
> Mat
>
> On Friday 28. August 2015 09:04:26 Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Mono's managed TLS implementation will have it (crypto coming from
> > BouncyCastle)
> >
> > The other options (ModernHttpClient, CFNetworkHandler) already support
> it
have tried websocket with certificate based authentication for
> client & server with mono 4.0 & it was not working for ECDSA.(I am testing
> on Ubuntu14.04)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@xamarin.com>
> wrote:
Hello,
We use tags for that, so you are looking for the mono-4.0.3.20 tag on git.
Miguel
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Normand norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a way to find the relation between a source tarball provided in
(1) and the git tree of (2)
Is there a git
,
Is that support handling ECDHE-ECDSA algorithm ?
Techi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Hello team,
I have posted an update on our TLS and networking stack efforts:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2015/Aug-27.html
Miguel
Very unlikely.
The page has not been updated in years, does not even cover the
Silverlight/Moonlight push, which is what made it usable, and most
importantly, recent developments where we replaced large chunks of it with
Microsoft's stack.
MIguel.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Neale Ferguson
Hello team,
I have posted an update on our TLS and networking stack efforts:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2015/Aug-27.html
Miguel
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
It is not multi-process safe, you would need to ensure that through an
external mean.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Neale Ferguson ne...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
Is registry multi-process safe? How are registry transactions maintained
by Mono? Also, I assume the EventLog is just syslog on
I configure my HomeBrew to use /brew
Otherwise, this will conflict.
Miguel.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Nate McMaster nate.mcmas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
There is a potential conflict with this change as Homebrew
http://brew.sh/ also uses /usr/local as the default install location.
Does
yes, produce a minimal test case that exhibits the issue.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Daniel Kuhne dakui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am getting assertion:
* Assertion at class.c:5078, condition `class' not met
Native stacktrace:
mono() [0x48f940]
Hello,
1. Is there a timeline for a 64 bit OS X framework release? A few months
ago the answer was no.
There is a definite timeline, which is before or at Cycle 7, which
currently looks like an end-of-year release. So that is the worst case
scenario.
We have internal builds that we have
Hello,
There is already a similar pull request.
The issue is that returning NULL there has a slightly different meaning.
So the complete fix is to restructure some of the code.
https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1817
Miguel
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:25 PM, David Curylo cury...@asme.org wrote:
this in general. I understand
much of it is trying to reach compliance with MS but ...
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Hello Greg,
Is that in HttpListener, or somewhere else?
Miguel
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Greg Young gregoryyou...@gmail.com
prefixes to accept to start
with. The biggest issue here is that the ms api is basically using
httpprefix to mean two very different things.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Well, it might be best if you explain what you have in mind, before we
waste
It is unlikely.
Your best bet is to cross compile.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:24 AM, cyd chasel...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a version of the mono source that can be built without bash?
I'm building mono on an Android device in the KBOX environment, which has
the busybox version of bash. It
Mono's source code by default builds a 64-bit version.
So the usual configure; make; make install with defaults does that.
Now, if you want the entire set of native libraries we ship with Mono (Gtk+
and family) as 64 bits, then that might require some work.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:20 AM,
Hello,
We do not have plans to add the code right now, but we would welcome anyone
that wants to contribute the code to Mono.
ReferenceSource code would only bring the API layer, but does not actually
bring an implementation of the algorithms.
The implementation would have to come from
Have you looked at WebSocket/ClientWebSocket in the System.Net.WebSocket
namespace?
Alternatively, for a chat app that we recently built, we used:
https://supersocket.codeplex.com/
Which comes with a nice WebSocket stack.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:05 AM, techi eth techi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Greg,
Is that in HttpListener, or somewhere else?
Miguel
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Greg Young gregoryyou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is some of the code in question:
IPAddress addr;
if (host == *)
addr = IPAddress.Any;
else if (IPAddress.TryParse(host, out addr) == false){
, Greg Young gregoryyou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Some others are saying the xamarin package is also 32bit + llvm
I don't have it installed here to test
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Hello,
LLVM is never the default for JIT configurations
Hello,
LLVM is never the default for JIT configurations, it is something that you
must manually opt-into.
Did homebrew default to it? Because LLVM as a JIT is *very slow*
Miguel
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Greg Young gregoryyou...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking through an issue from a
, not enabled.
GC:sgen
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Right, Mono on Mac is currently 32 bits, and we ship LLVM with it.
But we do not default to LLVM, that is something that you can use when
you
pass the --llvm option.
I believe we
the Microsoft compilers only? If so, I can then start
looking at modifying those projects to build using the Windows CE compilers.
-Chris Tacke
*From:* Miguel de Icaza [mailto:mig...@xamarin.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May 26, 2014 10:23 AM
*To:* Chris Tacke
*Cc:* mono-devel
*Subject:* Re
of
build yet).
Atsushi Eno
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Lluis Sanchez ll...@xamarin.com wrote:
El 28/03/2015, a les 15:32, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com va
escriure:
Hello,
Question: does XS/MD depend on Microsoft.Build.Engine.dll?
MD currently depends
atsu...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Microsoft.Build.dll is the (relatively) new build engine which
obsoleted Microsoft.Build.Engine.dll. The deprecated one is not in the
msbuild repo and that's what we use in xbuild.
Atsushi Eno
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
MSBuild
into Mono's current build setup.
Miguel
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Lluis Sanchez ll...@xamarin.com wrote:
El 27/03/2015, a les 19:41, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com va
escriure:
Hello Lluis,
I think once we are happy with msbuild, that we should build msbuild as
part
repo (
https://github.com/slluis/msbuild/tree/fix-xplat).
What’s the plan for integrating it into Mono?
El 19/03/2015, a les 20:40, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com va
escriure:
Hey guys,
I used the work from Alex to get started, and did some work on my own.
I posted all the patches
Hey guys,
I used the work from Alex to get started, and did some work on my own.
I posted all the patches to github.com/mono/msbuild
When using it to bootstrap building itself, it is not breaking at invoking
NuGet.
I am out of the office until next week, so I think this is as far I will
get.
Ah, thanks for providing the answers to the comments.
This pull request has been merged.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Steffen Kieß
steffen.ki...@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Hello,
pull request https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1155 fixes some issues
with string handling in System.Json:
Hello,
This looks like the code that you are trying to create has been linked out.
You need to preserve the code (reference it in some form from your code,
to prevent the linker from killing the code, as it would not be present on
device).
But that is as much of a guess as I can offer without
Applied, and updated also to support Mac.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler
ch---mono-de...@zeha.at wrote:
This patch (against mono-2.10.8.1 from Debian) allows setting
custom baud rates, and very likely would support a baudrate of
100.
I release this patch under
Hello Christian,
This looks fine. Are you the original author of the patch?
Miguel
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler
ch---mono-de...@zeha.at wrote:
This patch (against mono-2.10.8.1 from Debian) allows setting
custom baud rates, and very likely would support a
Hey,
We could do the ARM runs only for things that touch mono/mono. While it
is not perfect, it is a close enough approximation for what we care.
Miguel
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alexander Köplinger
alex.koeplin...@outlook.com wrote:
I very much agree, but currently when multiple PR
This looks like it was recently fixed.
MIguel
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Neale Ferguson ne...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
Over the last couple of days I’ve had problems building from head on
s390x.
(1) When I use 3.6.1 I get:
MCS [basic] mscorlib.dll
warning CS2002: Source file
Hello,
Yes, we are planning on applying to this year Google Summer of Code.
Miguel
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Ahmed GameHackerPM
gamehacke...@hotmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I just want to ask you if you will join this year in GSOC, if you will,
what will be the ideas list for this
Hello,
I am not sure why you are passing a --host command line option. Configure
should be able to figure this out on its own.
Miguel
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Rafael Mueller - Inventti
raf...@inventti.com.br wrote:
Hi there,
My (c#) application (compiled on windows, as x86)
Hey guys,
I assume this is related to the unique identifier generated on each ECMA
assembly?
The issue here is that this goes against the requirements of the spec.
What exactly is being proposed here?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
On Mon
Hello, [ I am CCing Atsushi so he can eyeball the patch ]
Thanks for the background research and for pointing me to that
long-standing bug.
It seems like a pull request was created, but that the author closed the
pull request.
I have updated the patch, can you try this and report back?
That looks like a bad package.
XSP should not depend on a specific version of Mono, instead it should
require at least a specific version of Mono.
CCing Jo.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:46 AM, sean_houston sean.sta...@aesir-media.com
wrote:
apache2-mod_mono-3.12 is available in the CentOS
Hello Edward,
We are doing a few things in the space:
- We are setting up a more comprehensive harness for SSL/TLS tests that
do not depend on remote servers.
- We are setting up a series of web tests to more comprehensively test
the http client (the tests today are not complete
Hello Aman,
Thanks for your interest. This is a good place to start:
http://www.mono-project.com/community/contributing/
Miguel
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Aman Priyadarshi aman.eur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm Aman from India.I want to contribute to this project. So, in
Hello Jonathan,
There seems to have been a couple of regressions on the test suite, but it
is hard to read from the graph.
Do we know what could have caused this?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Jonathan Purdy jonathan.pu...@xamarin.com
wrote:
In this pull request[1] I add GCC/Clang’s
Hey,
This has a couple of stages:
- Easy, allow for re-JITing of a method (in fact, I think this is one of
our interview questions)
- Easy, support regular + LLVM code generation
- Easy, instrument the code to track hot methods, and set a flag to do
LLVM code gen
- Easy, use
Yes, we have a partial project that does this.
Not sure where we are at on it, but the last time I checked, it did most of
the class libraries.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Arthur Peka artur.p...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of certmgr, was there any complexity in creating the solution
Hello,
We have to revisit the build scripts that we started last year that are
able to generate an entire solution/projects from the existing Makefiles.
Miguel
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com wrote:
From: Arthur Peka
Hello,
https://trello.com/c/RnH3O9vJ/18-system-data
I was aware of the native code in MS' driver, but it looked like it was
about SNI (transport), Windows-native auth, and other diagnostics. I
will investigate a bit more to see if bringing a least the TDS encoder/
decoder to Mono is
Hey,
We will not.
You can use 4_5 as the same define that includes new APIs.
Feel free to add away.
Rationale:
- there is only one GAC assembly for all the 4.0 based assemblies, so
there is only one assembly used at runtime
- The only useful purpose of building 4.5 is to get
Hello Damien,
I have not actually talked to Marek about this, but we have discussed
internally a bit what to do with System.Data.
Our current thinking is described here:
https://trello.com/c/RnH3O9vJ/18-system-data
As for your specific questions:
* If you are in the process of porting the
Seems like we have a case of these:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Dec-31.html
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Arthur Peka artur.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Andres,
you don't seem to get my point.
Firstly, IMO certmgr is *far* better off as a standalone app (not part of
Mono bundle).
Hello,
Considering that we do not even have a test, I think it would be nice to
turn one of the samples on the git discussion into the test. While not
100% robust, we could check that at least *one* of the interfaces has a
gateway, and perhaps make this into a soft failure for those that do not
Also, thanks so much for this patch!
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Hello,
Considering that we do not even have a test, I think it would be nice to
turn one of the samples on the git discussion into the test. While not
100% robust, we could
at 23:16, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com wrote:
Hello,
Considering that we do not even have a test, I think it would be nice to
turn one of the samples on the git discussion into the test. While not
100% robust, we could check that at least *one* of the interfaces has a
gateway
Just do `make install' on Mono.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Greg Young gregoryyou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are there any instructions on building/testing the area (linux)?
I don't mind jumping in it a bit
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Hey
We do not have a simple way to debug both.
You can debug managed with XAmarin Studio, and you can debug unmanaged with
gdb.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:29 PM, techi eth techi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone suggest me how i can debug unmanned/managed code together using
mono develop ?
I added support for this on master.
That said, there is an issue that I think will bite us.
Currently the fcntl P/Invoke declaration uses a long as a general purpose
way of passing flags to fcntl, and I suspect the parameter to F_NOCACHE
should be an int.
Thoughts?
Miguel
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015
F_RDAHEAD
I don't think the long is too horrible as its only defined as 0/non-zero
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
I added support for this on master.
That said, there is an issue that I think will bite us.
Currently the fcntl P/Invoke declaration
Regarding XS/MD support for the code contracts tools, there are really
two pieces.
The first is to port/reimplement the VS addin. It doesn't look
particularly complex, a proof of concept might only take a couple of
days.
This would be glorious. They seem to be doing some kind of
Hello Edward,
Martin is creating the branch now where we bring the Microsoft SslStream
into Mono as well as his crypto stack.
For details see:
https://trello.com/c/PvUaV89u/16-tls-stack
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com wrote:
I was
, and then alter the original
referencesource file with the #if statements.
We have done that already in a couple of places.
(More to come, last night we got XML working, but needs some work)
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Thanks Alex.
I do
Hey guys,
Microsoft has open sourced their CodeContracts tools:
https://github.com/CodeContractsDotNet/CodeContracts
The companion class libraries are here:
https://github.com/mono/referencesource/tree/mono/mscorlib/system/diagnostics/contracts
While Mono has an implementation, it might be a
Hello Edward,
I do not believe we have made changes to X509Chain.
The only thing we have been doing is reimplementing chunks of the protocol
(as it does not exist in the referecesource)
Miguel
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com wrote:
Hey guys,
My work is described here:
https://trello.com/c/L6jkUdOQ/12-system-runtime-serialization
The status of this patch is:
Work in progress to bring Microsoft System.Runtime.Serialization to Mono
The current code compiles by replacing existing Mono code with
Microsoft code
we got XML working, but needs some work)
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com
wrote:
Thanks Alex.
I do not think that we will have a strict rule for when to copy and when
to reference.
There are scenarios where we will want to keep a lot of the code in one
Hey guys,
If you are accepting pull requests on Mono's github, please request that
pull requests that were iterated multiple-times have their multiple commits
squashed into one.
Otherwise Mono ends up merging code that does things like:
- Commit 1:
Implement a feature + reformatted entire
Done, this patch can be merged.
Miguel
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Alexander Köplinger
alex.koeplin...@outlook.com wrote:
Any updates on this? Might be a good review candidate if you have some
spare time during the holidays :)
-- Alex
--
From:
Hey,
1465 looks great!
I will let someone more experienced with msbuild discuss 1464
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Alexander Köplinger
alex.koeplin...@outlook.com wrote:
Hey, I sent the following xbuild fixes that are necessary so that the .NET
Core framework projects can be compiled
My quick take, as I am about to bird a plane:
- ifdef out transactions
- SR missing stuff is pretty common, we have been stubbing these out, check
the recent commits to mono/mcs/class/System to get an idea
- use reference source for the landing spot.
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, Bernie Schoch
Hello,
For example, I'm looking at say WCF as a possibility but some questions pop
up?
Will WCF be part of .NET Core? if so should we wait until it's in .NET
Core?
I suspect it will be, but .NET core is not guaranteed to have the same API
as .NET Framework.
Mono currently implements the
Before we go down this path.
Mono 4.0 is not about a general call to clean things up. We are only
cleaning up removing the must-haves.
Please do not turn this into a threat to clean this up. That can be done
independently and on its own schedule.
Atsushi, I'll follow up later today on
Hello,
.NET's implementation of the TLS stack is built on top of native code, so
it wont work on Mono.
We have implemented TLS 1.1 and 1.2 on top of the not yet open sourced
networking stack and will be publishing it as soon as Microsoft open
sources the .NET networking stack.
Miguel
On Tue,
Hey,
I have a variation of this patch now. I need to rebuild my Mono before i
can commit it.
It will use a conditional compiler directive to use this other system
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Stephen Shaw ss...@decriptor.com wrote:
I can't comment on the code changes themselves, but it
1 - 100 of 1630 matches
Mail list logo