*To:* Andres G. Aragoneses kno...@gmail.com
mailto:kno...@gmail.com
*Cc:* Mono-list@lists.ximian.com mailto:Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Mono-list] GTKsharp 3
I have managed to gain the following information from
:* Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Mono-list] GTKsharp 3
I have managed to gain the following information from this bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648121
The banshee port to GTK# 3 is complete they are just waiting for a release
of GTK # 3 (as of 3
I believe the answers you're looking for are in the link I gave.
Daniel Hughes wrote
XWT although interesting is irrelevant to the question at hand. XWT will
use GTK on linux and so will still require working GTK 3 bindings.
So can we get back to the topic, I would love answers to my
Err, you can't do that.
Daniel Lo Nigro wrote
How would you use native widgets without using bindings of some sort?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:19 AM, 殷启聪 lt;seamlikok@gt; wrote:
Why there's no any cross-platform GUI toolkit that's written natively
in C#? I'm tired of using bindings. Is
On Tuesday 11. September 2012 11:53:03 Andrew York wrote:
How far along is XWT? I'm don't mind trying out something in beta for
fun, but I'm not smart enough to make major contributions. Is XWT far
enough along for the average end developer to start having fun with?
I recently tried it for a
Hi.
We should take a look of Qyoto project, Qt bindings are generated
automatically not like GTK's which had been created manually. The mono
team does not want to create a GTK 3 bindings because everything has to
be done from scratch again and this is a lot of work.
On 09/11/2012 01:12
The link does not actually answer any of my questions.
Who is working on it? Not answered, expect to say that some of the banshee
guys have contributed, doesn't tell me who is leading or drive the effort,
my guess is no one is.
Where is the code? Not answered at all
Where will it be released?
On 12/09/12 08:46, Mathias Tausig wrote:
On Tuesday 11. September 2012 11:53:03 Andrew York wrote:
How far along is XWT? I'm don't mind trying out something in beta for
fun, but I'm not smart enough to make major contributions. Is XWT far
enough along for the average end developer to start
I have managed to gain the following information from this bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648121
The banshee port to GTK# 3 is complete they are just waiting for a release
of GTK # 3 (as of 3 months ago, from Comment 8)
Mike is the maintainer of GTK# but he doesn't have
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] GTKsharp 3
I have managed to gain the following information from this bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648121
The banshee port to GTK# 3 is complete they are just waiting for a release of
GTK # 3 (as of 3 months ago, from Comment 8)
Mike
GTK 3 was released 10 Feb 2011. That's a long time ago.
During that time .net bindings have failed to eventuate. Information on
what has been happening has been very hard to find, despite a large number
of .net applications on linux using these bindings.
As the author of an opensource
The most recent bit of news I've read about GTK# 3:
http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Towards-GTK-3-0-tp4650597.html
Daniel Hughes wrote
GTK 3 was released 10 Feb 2011. That's a long time ago.
During that time .net bindings have failed to eventuate. Information on
what has been happening
Why there's no any cross-platform GUI toolkit that's written natively
in C#? I'm tired of using bindings. Is it possible to develop a C# GUI
toolkit that's OpenGL accelerated (like WPF and Clutter),
cross-platform (like wxWidgets and Qt) and uses native widgets in
different desktop environment?
There is this one that is being developed https://github.com/mono/xwt
and will be the foundation of MonoDevelop in the future from what I
understand.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, 殷启聪 seamli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why there's no any cross-platform GUI toolkit that's written natively
in C#? I'm
XWT is still a set of bindings. It calls native code / GUI toolkits
underneath. So that's not what he was asking for.
I guess there is just not enough money / motivation behind having a
fully-managed GUI toolkit. On the other hand, Mono WinForms is one,
technically.
Slide wrote
There is this
How do you expect to put anything on the screen or read the mouse,
keyboard etc without eventually using a native toolkit :)
XWT is very cool, not 100% working for me yet but a very good start.
On 11/09/2012 16:34, Stifu wrote:
XWT is still a set of bindings. It calls native code / GUI
How far along is XWT? I'm don't mind trying out something in beta for
fun, but I'm not smart enough to make major contributions. Is XWT far
enough along for the average end developer to start having fun with?
On 9/11/2012 11:50 AM, Ian Norton wrote:
How do you expect to put anything on the
Yes, eventually it has to use native code. But I guess the difference is
whether the GUI toolkit is made using solely the .NET / Mono framework, or
by shipping extra native code. Mono WinForms, as I mentioned, mostly relies
on the framework (using System.Drawing rather than calling an extra
XWT although interesting is irrelevant to the question at hand. XWT will
use GTK on linux and so will still require working GTK 3 bindings.
So can we get back to the topic, I would love answers to my questions
regarding GTK Sharp 3
Who is working on it?
Where is the code?
When should we expect
How would you use native widgets without using bindings of some sort?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:19 AM, 殷启聪 seamli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why there's no any cross-platform GUI toolkit that's written natively
in C#? I'm tired of using bindings. Is it possible to develop a C# GUI
toolkit that's
20 matches
Mail list logo
