Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-09 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mickeyf mic...@thesweetoasis.com wrote: We all understand that with an open source, volunteer effort things get done when they get done. What I had hoped to find out was: 1) Am I mis-reading the three links I referenced that suggest that this method has

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-09 Thread mickeyf
IOControl implements the common subset In other words, partly implemented, and I had the luck to stumble over that part that wasn't. My confusion was that the exception message implied not implemented at all. Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-09 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
You might be using an old definition file for MoMa. What IOCtrl are you trying to use? Mind that if it doesn't exist on unix, emulating their behavior is usually not feasible. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:14 AM, mickeyf mic...@thesweetoasis.com wrote: IOControl implements the common subset In

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-09 Thread mickeyf
This is code from a Windows app which works well, but written by someone no longer with us and which I'm porting to Ubuntu: byte[] inValue = new byte[] { 1, 0, 0, 0, 48, 117, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0 }; byte[] outvalue = new byte[10];

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-09 Thread mickeyf
I see how to set these values directly in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/, but that appears to be system wide. The.NET/Mono IOControl should be only for the socket in question, yes? -- View this message in context:

[Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-08 Thread mickeyf
System.Net.Sockets.Socket.IOControl is flagged by MoMA as not implemented, and sure enough, that exception is thrown when I try to run an app which includes it. However, If I'm reading the http://go-mono.com/status/ Class Status Page right, I don't see any suggestion that this should be

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-08 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
They are implemented when needed or when community steps in and contribute the code. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, mickeyf mic...@thesweetoasis.com wrote: System.Net.Sockets.Socket.IOControl is flagged by MoMA as not implemented, and sure enough, that exception is thrown when I try to run

Re: [Mono-list] Not Implemented timelines, Priorities, etc?

2012-08-08 Thread mickeyf
We all understand that with an open source, volunteer effort things get done when they get done. What I had hoped to find out was: 1) Am I mis-reading the three links I referenced that suggest that this method has actually been implemented? 2) Is there any ordered to-do list among the active