On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký
zarevucky.j...@gmail.com wrote:
qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt Jambi compiled using ikvm
Problem 1: It's a Java code running in Java VM which is running on Mono.
I don't know, how does IKVM performs in the terms of performance or
memory
2009/2/25 David Canar davidca...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký
zarevucky.j...@gmail.com wrote:
qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt Jambi compiled using ikvm
Problem 1: It's a Java code running in Java VM which is running on Mono.
I don't know, how does IKVM
2009/2/25 Jiří Zárevúcký zarevucky.j...@gmail.com:
The second way described is AOT compiling of the .NET wrapper to
native code, not the Java itself to IL.
Is there something incorrect, or is this overhead simply not noticeable?
That article isn't extremely clear, but it does state the
For those of you who like Qt and MONO, we have released the latest
version of the library qt4dotnet. qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt
Jambi compiled using ikvm. Now the library supports MONO for Windows,
MacOSX and Linux.
http://code.google.com/p/qt4dotnet/
Please try it out and let us know
qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt Jambi compiled using ikvm
Problem 1: It's a Java code running in Java VM which is running on Mono.
I don't know, how does IKVM performs in the terms of performance or
memory usage, so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that utterly
ineffective?
Just a side
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký
zarevucky.j...@gmail.com wrote:
qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt Jambi compiled using ikvm
Problem 1: It's a Java code running in Java VM which is running on Mono.
I'm pretty sure that the IKVM compiler he is talking about produces
.NET-native
