Awesome work!
I have been looking for something like this for a long time.
If we can get it working on Linux (Or preferably FreeBSD), I am very committed
to testing it out and reporting issues. My compiler development skills are
pretty much non-existent but I am happy to help where I can.
Out
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Karsten Pedersen kpeder...@live.co.ukwrote:
Out of interest, can the compiler generate a pure .NET output (similar to
cl /clr:safe)?
I just checked some of the generated code with PEVerify and it does not
seem to be verifiable at the moment (both metadata and
This sounds like it'd be pretty handy for quite a few users :)
It might be worth posting this to the mono-devel mailing list as well.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, João Matos ripzonetri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
So I've been working for a bit on a C++/CLI compiler and I think it's came
Il 09/12/2012 05:36, João Matos ha scritto:
Hi.
So I've been working for a bit on a C++/CLI compiler and I think it's
came along enough that it makes sense to announce it.
While I don't have any immediate use for this, I will happily say, as
someone who likes to dabble (and only dabble) in
Might not LLVM/clang be better to do something like this with?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: kpedersen
Sent: 9/10/2012 10:09 AM
To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: [Mono-list] C++/CLI Support
Hi Guys,
I know people have probably heard this many times but I believe mono could
really
There are a bunch of thorny issues to consider.
Do we want to support C++ CLI binaries done using the MS toolchain outside
of windows?
Supporting those requires writing a whole PE dynamic linkers, which is a
huge amount of work.
If not, we can very much simply use mono's AOT engine and produce a
There are a bunch of thorny issues to consider.
Heh, I would imagine ;)
I would not expect to support binaries from MSVC (even on Windows). After
all, Mingw and obviously Linux versions of vanilla GCC do not support them
due to things like name mangling.
I would be extremely happy to just be
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, kpedersen kpeder...@live.co.uk wrote:
There are a bunch of thorny issues to consider.
Heh, I would imagine ;)
I would not expect to support binaries from MSVC (even on Windows). After
all, Mingw and obviously Linux versions of vanilla GCC do not support
Hi!
What an ugly language have they created... I always considered C++ to be
very ugly in terms of code syntax. Now it looks like they've improved it
even more (note the % and ^ operators, new keywords, new templates, new
restrictions, new side effects, new rules for type coercion, new concepts
I don't think anyone around here likes VB too much, but we're still
implementing it.
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 11:52, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Hi!
What an ugly language have they created... I always considered C++ to be
very ugly in terms of code syntax. Now it looks like they've improved it
On Sunday 23 November 2003 11:52 am, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
My suggestion: don't go with this idea - let it die. Use C# instead - it
can be a bit slower sometimes, but is definitely more scalable in terms of
maintenance and programmer productivity.
Yes, but I really miss const correctness.
... a pain in time at
least.
Greetz,
-- Rob.
-Original Message-
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Maurizio Colucci; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] C++/CLI
Hi!
What an ugly language have they created... I always
12 matches
Mail list logo
