[Mono-list] Flavours of unix for mono.

2004-08-18 Thread Gautam Karnataki
Hi !!! Heard about Mono from a collegue while designing an architecture for C# code to be reused on the unix box. We are thinking of using mono but we need to know which flavours of unix does mono support (HP-UX, Solaris etc.)? Can you please help us with this? Rgds, Gautam

[Mono-list] Re: error on mono-win32 - glib-sharp.dll wrong?

2004-08-18 Thread Tobias Bradtke
Hi! I installed mono-1.0.1-gtksharp-1.0-win32-0.5.exe without an error. But if i run the gtk-example from the Mono Handbook (HelloWorld, second try) i get some warnings: [..] the new installer at

[Mono-list] mono-1.0.1 FC2 yum repository problem

2004-08-18 Thread Matthew Gatto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gatto]$ tail /etc/yum-mono.conf [mono] name=Mono baseurl=http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.0.1/fedora-2-i386/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] gatto]$ sudo yum -c /etc/yum-mono.conf install mono-complete Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: Fedora Core 2 - i386 - Base

[Mono-list] MacOS X, a debugger, and visual studio

2004-08-18 Thread Max Metral
Hi. Im trying to port an app built with Visual Studio. Its a Windows service app, but we can modify that or refactor it if necessary. My problem is that Ive successfully built the app, but it doesnt run and I cant seem to get any sort of dev env or debugger running. Ive tried to run

Re: [Mono-list] Flavours of unix for mono.

2004-08-18 Thread T Sureshkumar
mono supports Linux, Windows, Solaris, FreeBSD, HP-UX and MacOS X. suresh. Gautam Karnataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/17/2004 6:25:34 PM Hi !!! Heard about Mono from a collegue while designing an architecture for C# code to be reused on the unix box. We are thinking of using mono but we need

[Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Rüdiger Klaehn
Hi, I am new on this list. I have been interested in using .NET for numerical problems for some time. When investigating the lower than expected performance of some code of mine, I found out that both the Microsoft JIT and the mono JIT do not inline methods with an explicit struct parameter or

[Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Maynard Kuona
I am wondering how this mailing list is setup. I am used to, on other mailing lists to just clicking on reply to reply to the list, given that the reply to address is usually the posting address. If its not too much of a bother, could this be fixed to include this in the headers. As far as I can

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Kamil Skalski
Wednesday 18 August 2004 11:26, Maynard Kuona wrote: I am wondering how this mailing list is setup. I am used to, on other mailing lists to just clicking on reply to reply to the list, given that the reply to address is usually the posting address. If its not too much of a bother, could this

Re: [Mono-list] XSP stops working

2004-08-18 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 18:42, Jochen Wezel wrote: Hi Gonzalo, again! I know, I know, today, I'm killing your last nerves. But I'm heavily testing now my applications since VB.NET is now able to run in ASP.NET ;-) Do you know what this exception is? I simply removed one DLL (the

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Gert Kello
Probably it is you MUA configuration issue, my client is setting reply address correctly. Altough I didn't see any Reply tag in the header. And what e-mail client You are using? Mozilla Thunderbird uses from aadress for reply... -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Dick Porter
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 10:26, Maynard Kuona wrote: I am wondering how this mailing list is setup. I am used to, on other mailing lists to just clicking on reply to reply to the list, given that the reply to address is usually the posting address. If its not too much of a bother, could this be

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 05:26, Maynard Kuona wrote: I am wondering how this mailing list is setup. I am used to, on other mailing lists to just clicking on reply to reply to the list, given that the reply to address is usually the posting address. If its not too much of a bother, could this be

RE: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Varga Zoltan
Hi, There is no reason why such methods can't be inlined. It is just that the neccessary code is not yet implemented, or not tested enough to be enabled. Zoltan

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Rüdiger Klaehn
Varga Zoltan wrote: Hi, There is no reason why such methods can't be inlined. It is just that the neccessary code is not yet implemented, or not tested enough to be enabled. Good to hear that. Is somebody currently working on that? It

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Sijmen Mulder
Good to hear that. Is somebody currently working on that? It could make a big difference with graphical applications (System.Drawing.Point and System.Drawing.PointF) as well as with numerical applications (Complex) and financial applications (System.Decimal). I am implementing a 2D game

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Rüdiger Klaehn
Sijmen Mulder wrote: Good to hear that. Is somebody currently working on that? It could make a big difference with graphical applications (System.Drawing.Point and System.Drawing.PointF) as well as with numerical applications (Complex) and financial applications (System.Decimal). I am

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Sijmen Mulder
You would not have to do anything. All small methods that do not contain complex stuff like loops or exception handling would be inlined. Instant factor 4 speed boost :-) I have read the article you linked, and it is a nice article, explaining many things I did not know before. But there is

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Rüdiger Klaehn
Sijmen Mulder wrote: You would not have to do anything. All small methods that do not contain complex stuff like loops or exception handling would be inlined. Instant factor 4 speed boost :-) I have read the article you linked, and it is a nice article, explaining many things I did not know

[Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Shane Landrum
go-mono.com and go-mono.org have been persistently down for the last few days. This wouldn't be a problem except that they host the only copy I can find of the OS X packages for Mono 1.0.1. Does anyone know A when they'll be back up and B in the meantime, where to find the packages I seek? Does

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Sijmen Mulder
Does anyone know A when they'll be back up and B in the meantime, where to find the packages I seek? Does someone out here have a mirror? Go-mono.com works perfectly right for me, here in the Netherlands -- 'May the Lord bless you and protect you. May the Lord smile on you and be gracious

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Mauro Parra Miranda
Hello! Is working now, thanks to jbz Mauro On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 11:12, Shane Landrum wrote: go-mono.com and go-mono.org have been persistently down for the last few days. This wouldn't be a problem except that they host the only copy I can find of the OS X packages for Mono 1.0.1. Does

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Gert Kello
You would not have to do anything. All small methods that do not contain complex stuff like loops or exception handling would be inlined. Instant factor 4 speed boost :-) and, according to that document, If any of the method's formal arguments are structs, the method will not be inlined.

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Tom Larsen
http://www.go-mono.org gives me a redirect to http://www.mono-project.com as it should. The link for Mono 1.0.1 for OS X gave me the file. Is it possible the problem is on your end? In general, mirroring wouldn't be a bad idea though... Tom Larsen On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Shane Landrum wrote:

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Tom Larsen
Inlining is a function of the compiler. The runtime doesn't particuarlly care whether the next operator is a call onto a function or the function inline. The tradeoff is of course the classic speed vs space. A commonly used function might incur less of a performance hit if placed in line but

Re: [Mono-list] mono-1.0.1 FC2 yum repository problem

2004-08-18 Thread Duncan Mak
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 17:50, Matthew Gatto wrote: Resolving dependencies ..Unable to satisfy dependencies Package libgdiplus needs cairo = 0.1.23-2, this is not available. Package libgdiplus needs libcairo.so.1, this is not available. Package libgdiplus needs libpixman.so.1, this is not

Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs

2004-08-18 Thread Rüdiger Klaehn
Tom Larsen wrote: Inlining is a function of the compiler. Inlining in .NET is a function of the JIT compiler that compiles the IL to native code. The compiler that compiles source code to IL code does not do any inlining. The runtime doesn't particuarlly care whether the next operator is a

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down (now fixed)

2004-08-18 Thread Shane Landrum
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Tom Larsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: http://www.go-mono.org gives me a redirect to http://www.mono-project.com as it should. The link for Mono 1.0.1 for OS X gave me the file. Is it possible the problem is on your end? As I understand, it's been

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 12:12, Shane Landrum wrote: go-mono.com and go-mono.org have been persistently down for the last few days. This wouldn't be a problem except that they host the only copy I can find of the OS X packages for Mono 1.0.1. Does anyone know A when they'll be back up and B in

Re: [Mono-list] go-mono.(com|org) down

2004-08-18 Thread Jonathan Duncan
I haven't seen them down. Are you getting an error? Try mono-project.com Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/18/04 2:03 pm On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 12:12, Shane Landrum wrote: go-mono.com and go-mono.org have been persistently down for the last few days. This wouldn't be a problem except that

[Mono-list] nant-0.85-20040817.zip won't build, 'NAnt.NUnit1.Tasks.NUnitTask' is obsolete

2004-08-18 Thread Adam Monsen
I'm using mono on Fedora Core 2, RPMs from http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.0.1/fedora-2-i386/. I'm unable to install nunut. Someone on irc.gnome.org#mono suggested a CVS snapshot, so I'm trying to build nant-0.85-20040817.zip (downloaded from http://nant.sf.net/builds/). Here is the error I

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Maynard Kuona
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 11:54 +0100, Dick Porter wrote: On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 10:26, Maynard Kuona wrote: I am wondering how this mailing list is setup. I am used to, on other mailing lists to just clicking on reply to reply to the list, given that the reply to address is usually the posting

Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address

2004-08-18 Thread Todd Berman
This message was brought to you by the 'Reply to All' button, conveniently located directly to the right of the Reply button. --Todd ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list