In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:14:29 +1000, Brian May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bam Richard == Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bam
bam ludovic In the sense that mtn approve h:foo.bar.cvs --branch
bam ludovic foo.bar does the same thing, that is :) Or am I
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:18 AM, William Uther wrote:
On 10/09/2007, at 7:49 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Hi all!
I've noticed that the changelog some people use for monotone is not
quite GNU-style. I'm sure you all hacked stuff longer than me,
so you
can correct me at any time, but aren't we
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, Julio M.
Merino Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84 doing that, because he'll have to explain *why* he is
jmmv84 committing that at once.
I totally agree with
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, Julio M.
Merino Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84 doing that, because he'll have to explain *why* he is
jmmv84
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:31:59 -0400, Stephen
Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
stephen_leake I was waiting for the 0.36 release to be done to raise
stephen_leake this issue again, and then I was waiting for time to
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84 doing that,
As it isn't obvious how to drive Monotone on a Unix server with an RSA
private key loaded into Pageant (PuTTY's ssh-agent(1) variant) on a
Windows desktop, here are the required steps -- just for information and
for the record:
1. Generate the Monotone RSA private/public key pair
$ mtn genkey
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
As it isn't obvious how to drive Monotone on a Unix server with an RSA
private key loaded into Pageant (PuTTY's ssh-agent(1) variant) on a
Windows desktop, here are the required steps -- just for information and
for the record:
1. Generate
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Ben Walton wrote:
I just synced a branch called nvm.daemon-support. All tests are
passing on my tree, but I've only got Ubuntu Feisty to test on right
now. I hope that someone can build/test it on more platforms (windows
would be especially helpful).
Let me know if
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Thomas Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf S. Engelschall schrieb:
The only possibility I've found is to manually issue an additional cert
for the new branch via:
$ mtn cert h:foo.bar.cvs branch foo.bar
This worked just fine. But I'm
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
But is _THIS_ really the intention behind the mtn approve?
Interesting, I've always wondered what this command is about and
especially why it is named approve. Well, even if it is just for
creating branches I'm still totally
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:12:54 -0400, Stephen
Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
stephen_leake On the other hand, that is the way we typically work. I
stephen_leake often notice little things while I'm working on one
stephen_leake big thing. Would it be better to _not_ fix
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:27 +0200, Ralf S.
Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rse+monotone-devel On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
rse+monotone-devel 5. Load example.rsa.ppk in PuTTY's Pageant -- Voila!
rse+monotone-devel
rse+monotone-devel Ok,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:27 +0200, Ralf S.
Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rse+monotone-devel On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
rse+monotone-devel 5. Load example.rsa.ppk in PuTTY's Pageant --
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:26:47 +0200, Ralf S.
Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rse+monotone-devel On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
rse+monotone-devel
rse+monotone-devel In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007
13:32:27 +0200, Ralf S.
Thanks for this Ralf. I'll look at it shortly. I realize that I
relied on the daemon call...I'm not sure as to the portability of this
call, but it is common to Linux systems and (as cygwin relies heavily
on linux libs/tools/etc) cygwin [I haven't built against cygwin though
and don't know the
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:26:47 +0200, Ralf S.
Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rse+monotone-devel On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
rse+monotone-devel
rse+monotone-devel In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
On 9/11/07, Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're talking about two different kinds of documentations. When I
update my workspace, or even better, when I'm about to, and I want to
know what will happen, the most natural is to check out the log. If
all the log says is that this and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:19:33 +0200, Ralf S.
Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rse+monotone-devel Sure, that's what I'm doing, Richard.
I probably have to go back and read the original mail again... bbl.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:00:49AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
Using certs, it is possible to link sets of revisions to an entry in
an external log file. Then each entry in the external log file can
contain a global description of what happened for this set of
revisions.
That way, and with
On 9/11/07, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:00:49AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
Using certs, it is possible to link sets of revisions to an entry in
an external log file. Then each entry in the external log file can
contain a global description of what
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:57:34AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
On 9/11/07, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose that set of revisions ~ branch? It would definitely be
nice to have more branch metadata.
Yes, there is a relationship between them, I am not sure what you mean
On 9/11/07, Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're talking about two different kinds of documentations. When I
update my workspace, or even better, when I'm about to, and I want to
know what will happen, the most natural is to check out the log. If
all the log says is that this and
On 11/09/2007, at 9:12 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84 doing that,
I've written a quick patch (attached) to implement using Putty's
ssh-agent (Pageant) on win32.
It works just fine for me; any suggestions or complaints are, of
course, welcome.
Thanks.
-Daniel
win32_pageant_ssh-agent.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Stephen Leake wrote:
I haven't heard any objections to this; a couple people said they
would review the docs and such.
So if I have not heard any objections by this weekend (Sept 15), I'll
merge nvm.basic_io.inventory to nvm then.
Ok?
I haven't had a chance to read the docs on the
Derek Scherger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Leake wrote:
I haven't heard any objections to this; a couple people said they
would review the docs and such.
So if I have not heard any objections by this weekend (Sept 15), I'll
merge nvm.basic_io.inventory to nvm then.
Ok?
I haven't
27 matches
Mail list logo
