[Monotone-devel] Re: project.cc:586: detected internal error, 'E(false)' violated

2010-09-20 Thread Gour D.
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:50:06 -0400 Stephen == Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote: Stephen Did something change with your keys recently? Yes. I rm-ed old key and added a new one, but forgot (due to inexperience) to issues 'dropkey' command. :-( Sincerely, Gour -- Gour |

[Monotone-devel] project.cc:586: detected internal error, 'E(false)' violated

2010-09-18 Thread Gour D.
Hello! Today I played a bit with monotone wanting to suspend one branch and create a new one 'cause, for some reason, committing in the old branch was always causing divergence and need for a merge. However, while doing it, I faced a problem...Here is the console log along with the contents of

[Monotone-devel] Better SCM Initiative

2010-09-16 Thread Gour D.
Hello! Just stumbled upon post about one interesting project... Please check if Monotone is adequately represented. Sincerely, Gour p.s. Tried to post to user-list via gmane, but it (still) says: Read-only :-( signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions

2010-08-10 Thread Gour D.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:54:23 +0200 Thomas == Thomas Keller wrote: Thomas But yes, nvm.dumb uses it (while it would be interesting how Thomas many people are using dumb transport these days), but maybe Thomas this deprecation will finally force us bringing the work on Thomas alternative transport

[Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions

2010-08-10 Thread Gour D.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:20:43 -0400 John == John Bailey rekkano...@rekkanoryo.org wrote: John It would be nice to have a way to send (or possibly even generate John for manual sending) a series of patches in a manner similar to John what git and hg allow. +1 Sincerely, Gour -- Gour |

[Monotone-devel] mtn vs. hg

2010-08-08 Thread Gour D.
Hello! In order to successfully defend usage of monotone for our project from posible hg attack, I'd like to hear some pro/cons about hg vs. mtn? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA

[Monotone-devel] Re: New mailing lists have been added to gmane

2010-08-06 Thread Gour D.
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 01:19:55 +0200 Thomas == Thomas Keller wrote: Thomas Actually I specifically disabled that feature because I think Thomas gmane is great for browsing things, but if somebody wants to Thomas post to the list, he should be subscribed to it (and optionally Thomas configure to

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-31 Thread Gour D.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:25:02 + (UTC) Ludovic == Ludovic Brenta ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org wrote: Ludovic I've been doing this for several years now, without a problem Ludovic on my Debian laptop. The only trick, for me, was to ignore Ludovic some files which are symlinks to files outside

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-26 Thread Gour D.
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:07:29 -0700 jack == jack-monot...@mudshark.org wrote: jack I've been doing this for a while.. I keep a vendor branch of jack OpenBSD /etc, and then branch off for each host. A new version jack of the OS is only a propagate away. In my case I'd just keep my desktop

[Monotone-devel] /etc under version control

2010-07-25 Thread Gour D.
Hello! For a long time I wanted to keep my /etc under version control, but darcs is one of those DVCS where it is explicitly said it is not safe to do due to lack of support for perms symlinks...So, this is nice opportunity to deploy Monotone... On #monotone I've got info to take a look at

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-25 Thread Gour D.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:00:29 +0200 Lapo == Lapo Luchini l...@lapo.it wrote: Lapo Mhh, there are hooks for attribute handling, but out of the box Lapo I fear monotone is not much more capable of versioning a Lapo whole /etc without problems (for more or less the same reason Lapo that darcs says).

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-25 Thread Gour D.
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:47:48 -0400 hendrik == hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote: hendrik Maybe we should start logging bugs against package managers. :-) hendrik Of course if you exclusively hand-edit your /etc it's another hendrik story. I'm doing it manually, but would like to revert easily if

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-25 Thread Gour D.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:13:01 +1000 Brian == Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Brian Have a look at etckeeper. Brian Brian http://joey.kitenet.net/code/etckeeper/ Thank you for reminding me about it. Brian At one time monotone was supported, although, unfortunately, I Brian don't

[Monotone-devel] Re: /etc under version control

2010-07-25 Thread Gour D.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:20:19 +1000 Brian == Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Brian Still, as mercurial is supported, I think this should mean it is Brian possible to support monotone too. Somebody needs to write the Brian code. I pulled the repo and see that everything is written