Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [ANN] mtn2git v0.1

2008-09-15 Thread Markus Wanner
heads appear in the same branch on the same machine will be the public repository. Anyway, If that happens the commits are still there, just dangling temporarily in no branch. ..for the mtn repo imported into git that is, right? Regards Markus Wanner (ne Schiltknecht

Re: [Monotone-devel] using empty() instead of size()

2008-09-22 Thread Markus Wanner
16.29 0.00 This leads me to think that the STL implementation doesn't provide an O(1) implementation for size()... savings is avg memory consumption seems to confirm this, no? Other explanations? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] using empty() instead of size()

2008-09-23 Thread Markus Wanner
such as annotate with quite well populated caches. Anyway, sorry for the noise. I've just dropped the comment from NEWS. Regards Markus Wanner annotate-a-ref.csv annotate-a-new.csv p annotate-avg-resident-MiB 23.53 23.49 0.70

Re: [Monotone-devel] using empty() instead of size()

2008-09-23 Thread Markus Wanner
; something is deadly slow. Would this tool help with that? You can certainly run benchmarks over NFS as well. Although I'm not sure how helpful that is. You are already saying it's deadly slow. What difference does a benchmark value make against real world experience? Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] using empty() instead of size()

2008-09-24 Thread Markus Wanner
should have a look at oprofile and try the exact mtn actions you want profiling data for. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] using empty() instead of size()

2008-09-24 Thread Markus Wanner
can affect when the memory usage is sampled and hence the estimated memory usage. Yeah, I've been questioning the 'avg' value as well. If you now tell me that sampling is done at 1 second intervals, then I even suspect the max value to not be very meaningful. Regards Markus Wanner

[Monotone-devel] upgrade of included botan for mtn

2008-09-27 Thread Markus Wanner
]). That alone is a good reason to push the library-build branch. Regards Markus Wanner [1]: benchmark results for sha1: (using mtn benchmark_sha1): default botan sha1: ~ 144 MiB/s botan_sha1_sse: ~ 234 MiB/s I've been unable to measure the amd64_asm variant, yet

Re: [Monotone-devel] upgrade of included botan for mtn

2008-09-27 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Markus Wanner wrote: I've finally taken the time to go through upgrading the included botan library to 1.7.12. Sorry, I've forgotten the most important part: please test net.venge.monotone.botan. I'd like to land that upgrade it on mainline. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] upgrade of included botan for mtn

2008-09-27 Thread Markus Wanner
for MinGW, but the machine finally died. I may be able to get another one. That would certainly be helpful. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] upgrade of included botan for mtn

2008-09-27 Thread Markus Wanner
module) should be significantly faster than the C++ on non-SSE2 x86, and maybe faster than the SSE2, but I haven't compared them yet. Aha, good to know. Thank you again. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org

[Monotone-devel] library build

2008-09-27 Thread Markus Wanner
but leaves that task for 'make', making you fiddle with aclocal in subdirectories if things don't work out as planned? Comments? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Monotone-devel] library build

2008-09-30 Thread Markus Wanner
Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] library build

2008-10-01 Thread Markus Wanner
having upgraded (and now landed) monotone's included botan to 1.7.12. Jack is already approaching 1.7.15 with yet another set of renaming. I'm rather going to use the nvm.stripped branch than continue to manually upgrade again. Regards Markus Wanner

[Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-07 Thread Markus Wanner
/botan/build.h did exist, so it should have found it, if the -I flag had been passed to g++) Any ideas? Not so far, but I'll check the issue. Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman

[Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-08 Thread Markus Wanner
Hello Jack, Jack Lloyd wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote: Hm.. you manually added 'botan-config' from /home/lloyd/.. to your PATH, right? Yes (and edited it slightly so it would produce the right output for an in-dir build) Are you sure this emits proper

Re: [Monotone-devel] Questions about Monotone

2008-10-08 Thread Markus Wanner
as the changes don't conflict, the merge algorithm does everything for you. Remember that branches are cheap. Another way is to split logically different modules into different files, which is advisable anyway, IMO. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] Questions about Monotone

2008-10-08 Thread Markus Wanner
the program to be in the future. But truthfully it will be a long time before it gets there. You can also see why I am working on two things at once. Feature_A usually is refactoring the code to make it modular, clean and correct. Understood. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-09 Thread Markus Wanner
to use the provided botan :-( I've removed my system wide botan and can confirm that the issue is solved now. (As of e5f6d85442972da43d641bd3d7bf5d6667bbd23a). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-12 Thread Markus Wanner
Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone upgrade policy for the SQLite copy?

2008-10-12 Thread Markus Wanner
think. What's most important for me now is making monotone compatible with newer sqlite versions. Do you mind suspending these branches? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped test results + adding version numbers to version --full

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Jack Lloyd wrote: New version. Use the version macros for Botan instead of calling the string function. Mostly for consistency with the rest of the version # sources. Thanks, very cool. Committed as rev ce0db5b1f6d3b9ab45535784e298599733d0d6ab. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, I've now corrected or worked around issues with various sqlite versions. These tests have failed before: Markus Wanner wrote: 146 database_checkFAIL (line 23) 216 i_selectorFAIL (line 32) Revision

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Markus Wanner wrote: 3.4.1 (what we shipped up to now) Oops, revoking that. 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 currently fail on test 'database_dump_load', which is fishy because 3.4.1 was integrated before, no? I'm investigating on the issue. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
not require the hex() function. I don't know how SQLite handles such cases, but I do know that not paying attention to that kind of thing have and still can lead to problems. Agreed. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll check if we can add dynamic version checks as well. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
... Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
library is having to use sqlite3_prepare() instead of sqlite3_prepare_v2(), which exists only since 3.3.14. However, as that's just 1.5 years old and because 3.3.8 is in etch, I'm trying to still support those versions. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-13 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Markus Wanner wrote: Richard Levitte wrote: Just a moment ago, I saw a change that made the montone code depend on the version of SQLITE as described by a C macro. That's fine and dandy provided you link monotone with the static library, but what happens if it's linked with the shared

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Wanner
only. See: http://www.lua.org/bugs.html. That's why I made nvm.stripped require lua 5.1.x (and not 5.0.x). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Wanner
global lua variable). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Concerns about the net.venge.monotone.stripped branch

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Wanner
(build time) require 5.1.x anyway. I've thus reverted to show only 'Lua 5.1' in rev 6b777e3eb453b3b0be4d9aaa93e81cd56c6ca635. (As opposed to showing the patch version (i.e. 5.1.3) we've built against). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Wanner
into testing all possible combinations of library versions? Certainly not *all* possible combinations. I'd say we don't even need to test every single patch version of each library. After all, these (should) provide a stable API and ABI. Regards Markus Wanner

[Monotone-devel] dates in monotone

2008-10-16 Thread Markus Wanner
still wondering why we (uhm.. Zack) have implemented gmtime() from scratch. The comments tell something about systems not using the Unix epoch. But which system? Are the mktime() and gmtime() system functions really that unusable for portable software? Regards Markus Wanner

[Monotone-devel] Re: dates in monotone

2008-10-16 Thread Markus Wanner
on mainline? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: dates in monotone

2008-10-16 Thread Markus Wanner
af1cd9d04a3cabab86dc14c8167ff5e83b26d6a6, I've reverted that to using the system's gmtime() to gain a struct tm, which is independent of the system's epoch. Instead of creating a date string from there, I'm now using our own date_t::mktime() function, which is guaranteed to use Unix epochs. Regards Markus Wanner

[Monotone-devel] Re: dates in monotone

2008-10-16 Thread Markus Wanner
representation of date_t to use (comparable) u64 seconds since Unix epoch, instead of storing strings. Maybe I need to check for performance issues, but I don't think this part is overly performance critical. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: dates in monotone

2008-10-16 Thread Markus Wanner
milliseconds. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone Security

2008-10-17 Thread Markus Wanner
. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: hypothetical - future-dated certs (Re: Monotone Security)

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
Markus Wanner [1]: full list of date mismatches: mtn: checking timestamps of ancestor revisions mtn:rev 006972c572eb094a3c03d3ea6105e7f31f5bfa05 - rev c6bd5efd89266879cf9cbe7006b0fe5ca5d5b4dc mtn:but date 2003-10-20T22:15:28 ! - 2003-10-20T21:38:09 mtn:(difference: 2239 seconds) mtn

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: hypothetical - future-dated certs (Re: Monotone Security)

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
it intersects with branch policy, and in part because I'd really like to think of a nice way to make it work for revision encryption too.. Sounds very much like something that could work together with policy branches, no? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
Markus Wanner - Revision: 4dd538bd7bb906041b817b8bc6a93e87fb3759d5 Ancestor: ee293e066aa9e8222b7ce3b854affe49ddf9317c Ancestor: ee5efcb81167e04e6c915ce21bb32b832b7ad964 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008-04-30T15:32:06

Re: [Monotone-devel] WARNING: ~/.monotone/keys CONSIDERED HARMFUL

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
point. However, it *should* not be necessary to create and drop keys for that, but instead just adjust keys to trust, possibly limited in time. Hopefully we get there with your policy branches, one day... :-) I must admit that I still didn't look at your branch... Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] WARNING: ~/.monotone/keys CONSIDERED HARMFUL

2008-10-20 Thread Markus Wanner
harmful for all others as well, as you make it sound. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit thoughts - and changes?

2008-10-21 Thread Markus Wanner
now and then are pretty low here. I could only attend half a day or so. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: WARNING: ~/.monotone/keys CONSIDERED HARMFUL

2008-10-21 Thread Markus Wanner
. Once we use hashes for keyids that is. Huh? How should that be possible? Isn't it sufficient exchanging known public keys during netsync? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org

Re: [Monotone-devel] WARNING: ~/.monotone/keys CONSIDERED HARMFUL

2008-10-21 Thread Markus Wanner
or not... ;-). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] WARNING: ~/.monotone/keys CONSIDERED HARMFUL

2008-10-21 Thread Markus Wanner
identity remained the same. I simply added my new name, now having Markus Schiltknecht and Markus Wanner as names for my identity. the guy who owns this key .. that's exactly the identity part of the story. Just replace this key with a GPG key and you could theoretically throw away monotone keys

[Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-23 Thread Markus Wanner
for the (unmaintained) netxx? Anybody used boost::asio before? Thoughts? Comments? Regards Markus Wanner [1]: Nathaniel: boost::fs is slow: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/4262 ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-23 Thread Markus Wanner
, the assumption is good enough to provide that convenience feature called date cert. To help the user making that convenience feature more reliable, it would help if monotone checked date certs, IMO, without hurting anything else. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-23 Thread Markus Wanner
seconds, and hence is monotonic. Conversion between UTC and local time is pretty simple on most systems, where as UTC to TAI and back is not as common. IMO the user shouldn't need to care about anything except local time. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-23 Thread Markus Wanner
think we should warn there. Even make hints about clock skews. Why is that so unwanted for monotone? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
? Anyway, I think there's enough resistance to drop the idea for now. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] nvm.dates

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
, see below for examples - no warnings, no further checking, only db info is affected. I've committed that into a separate branch nvm.dates.statistics. Please review as well, I consider that to be ready to land on mainline, too. Regards Markus Wanner Here's the relevant additional part of db info

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
. Cool, thanks for this opinion. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
. Agreed. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
is currently sufficient for my needs WRT dates. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: date certs on net.venge.monotone

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
, at the moment it would involve unwanted UI uglification. So I'm postponing this proposal until we have policy branches :-) Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
as C++. If we don't require stack unwinding on error (I have not looked at the code), then dynamic linking is fine, but I think this is a candidate for bundling. I'll check this issue. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
Hello Jack, Jack Lloyd wrote: I would really like to get 1.8.0 out the door before the end of the year. We'll see. Sounds fine to me. Thanks for the overview. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] Lua loading dynamic libraries not possible in monotone?

2008-10-24 Thread Markus Wanner
libraries. (And I'm curious if you can get nvm.stripped to compile on MacOS X. ;-) ) Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-25 Thread Markus Wanner
for propagating lua errors back to the monotone user, just like loading failures. There are not many tests for such thing, are there? I didn't find neither unit nor lua tests. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-25 Thread Markus Wanner
or feature. I suspect that's because there is no system library naming convention that distinguishes between otherwise identical libraries, one compiled with C++, one with C. Object symbols are also different. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] compilation failure on Win32 MinGW

2008-10-25 Thread Markus Wanner
distclean' and probably re-run the autoconf toolchain? I've upgraded the included botan version which carried some renames and such. But I didn't test on Win32. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.dates

2008-10-25 Thread Markus Wanner
to object to landing this on mainline either. Some of the stats could be useful; frequency of checkins might correlate with something :). Hehe... yeah. :-) Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
a good point as well. So we don't only need to pay attention to the lua - mtn boundary, but also the other way around, when lua calls back mtn. Thanks for that hint. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.dates

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
before 1970, which is a pretty common boundary. I don't see much reason to add support for that now, either. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] compilation failure on Win32 MinGW

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
the changes to Makefile.am with minor adjustments and some comments on these exceptions. Thanks for your report and please test again. All in all I'm really looking forward to nvm.stripped to get rid of these custom build harness issues. Do you mind test building that branch on MinGW? Regards Markus

Re: [Monotone-devel] Lua loading dynamic libraries not possible in monotone?

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
by using a stand-alone Lua copy or by compiling a tiny piece of C code that links against the library and execute it on the machine. Agreed. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman

[Monotone-devel] Re: Can't find lua lib

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
want to try various LUA_CPPFLAGS (or was it LUA_CFLAGS, I don't remember...). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.dates review

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
differences to them. IMO this has already taken way too long and we should better spend our dev-time on more relevant things. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.dates review

2008-10-27 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Markus Wanner wrote: Agreed, renamed to millisecs_since_unix_epoch(). Hm.. this isn't used anywhere, since date_t::operator-() is sufficient in all cases so far. So we might even drop it. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Summit thoughts - and changes?

2008-10-28 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Lapo Luchini wrote: Other people? Comments? December doesn't work for me anymore... sorry. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] compilation failure on Win32 MinGW

2008-10-28 Thread Markus Wanner
I'm not particularly found in m4. I'll have to get my MinGW buildbot back on line; the video output died, so I need to get a new computer. Having a MinGW buildbot would certainly be cool. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone

[Monotone-devel] mtn wiki

2008-11-03 Thread Markus Wanner
in the know: * what's missing on the new ikiwiki? * what does it take to switch to the new one? * what does it give us, that the former one didn't? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

[Monotone-devel] mtn buildbots

2008-11-03 Thread Markus Wanner
probably all Debian, but none the less... Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] compilation failure on Win32 MinGW

2008-11-03 Thread Markus Wanner
the test suite. Again, strip it! Well, we could add a future process section to the wiki. But this is moot, since the wiki is currently not editable. Good point. What's up with the wiki? Let's start another thread for that question, though... Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Summit thoughts - and changes?

2008-11-12 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Lapo Luchini wrote: What about 17th-18th January 2009? Works for me as well. Although I cannot promise to be available all weekend long. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org

[Monotone-devel] heads up on nvm.stripped

2008-11-12 Thread Markus Wanner
it. It rather looks like botan offers something similar to benchmark various sha1 engines. I didn't look into that, though, but don't think we need to duplicate that work. nvm.stripped now compiles fine and passes all tests again. Regards Markus Wanner monotone 0.41 (base revision

Re: [Monotone-devel] heads up on nvm.stripped

2008-11-13 Thread Markus Wanner
because such a benchmark might not pay-off every time mtn is invoked. Alternatively have it stored in monotonerc and set as a system config during installation of monotone. Storing in _MTN/options sounds easier to automate, so I'm currently favoring that variant. Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] mtn status speed

2008-12-10 Thread Markus Wanner
been considered, but argued against, because stat() should be fast and simple enough. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone Crash

2008-12-10 Thread Markus Wanner
this as well, but haven't been able to reproduce it either. A glibc error is rather bizarre, IMO. Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of nvm.stripped

2008-12-21 Thread Markus Wanner
with reasonable efforts. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of nvm.stripped

2008-12-25 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Stephen Leake wrote: If you are refering to the conflicts resolution stuff in nvm.resolve_conflicts, that has already been merged into main. Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise, then. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone-0.41 compile failure with glibc(disabled-nls)

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
is, that ./configure still says: ... checking whether NLS is requested... yes ... (as long as I don't manually give --disable-nls). So I'm guessing my glibc is still compiled with nls. How do I check? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list

Re: [Monotone-devel] throw usage(); or N(); for argument checking?

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
is maintained in case of throw usage(), I'm fine. I dislike tools which just throw the complete usage page at me and let me figure myself. Some hint on what's wrong certainly helps. And that hint should survive, IMO. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] throw usage(); or N(); for argument checking?

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
proposes? Clearer separation of the two. 2. N() is not the best choice for handling this to begin with. Agreed. Timothy proposed using throw usage(); instead, which is according to these two requests, AFAICT. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone 0.42: peer [...] IO failed in confirmed state (success)?

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
Hello Timothy, Markus Wanner wrote: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: | mtn: peer monotone.ca IO failed in confirmed state (success) | mtn: successful exchange with monotone.ca I can reproduce this on a i386 FreeBSD 6.4 and will try to hunt the bug - sometime this month. Thank you for reporting

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone-0.41 compile failure with glibc(disabled-nls)

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
help? # USE=-nls emerge glibc Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone-0.41 compile failure with glibc(disabled-nls)

2009-01-04 Thread Markus Wanner
.. yeah. I'll try the hardened variant, cannot hurt to have such a hardened buildbot... Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export

2009-01-05 Thread Markus Wanner
comment on writing mtn git_import? Problems we are facing there? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.dates review of the review

2009-01-05 Thread Markus Wanner
won't have time to look into this again anytime soon. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export

2009-01-05 Thread Markus Wanner
an import and export group is equally stupid. Sorry if that didn't get clear, but I'd vote for the smallest change for now. (IMO, that means leaving cvs_import and git_export, but put them into a single command group). Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export

2009-01-05 Thread Markus Wanner
with a custom lua command...) I absolutely agree. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export

2009-01-06 Thread Markus Wanner
. However, most other VCSen I've seen so far do not allow such a thing. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] nvm.dates landed

2009-01-06 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Markus Wanner wrote: Barry any objections I plan to land both tomorrow. net.venge.monotone.dates.statistics (and therefore net.venge.monotone.dates) have just landed on mainline. Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone-0.41 compile failure with glibc(disabled-nls)

2009-01-06 Thread Markus Wanner
there are enough other bugs ;-) Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] memory access violation in win32 0.42 when canceling blocked `mtn diff --external` using Ctrl+C

2009-01-07 Thread Markus Wanner
suite for 0.42? rant I'm trying to get MinGW installed, but Windoze is so damn uncomfortable! /rant Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] memory access violation in win32 0.42 when canceling blocked `mtn diff --external` using Ctrl+C

2009-01-07 Thread Markus Wanner
on polish locale is 3,4 grrr They are: 1. minor, 2. unrelated I forgot to report them never mind having time to fix. Can you reproduce what the OP reported? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] compatibility of 0.40 and 0.41 question

2009-01-08 Thread Markus Wanner
pulling, pushing and syncing databases? Please read UPGRADE and/or NEWS. AFAICT there have not been any netsync incompatibilities since at least 0.25. For database schema changes, a simple mtn db migrate should do the trick. What does mtn version --full and mtn db info give? Regards Markus Wanner

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Thomas Keller wrote: Anyways, the error is quite common and unfortunately won't be fixed any time soon. Let's at least say: we should try to improve the error message. Do we have some sort of TODO file or something? Or is this a summit'09 task: to organize todo items? Regards Markus

  1   2   3   4   >