Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 16.05.10 11:19, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge,
give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another time, otherwise
just merge it.
Am 17.05.2010 14:08, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 16.05.10 11:19, schrieb Stephen Leake:
For net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake, I've removed
the --recursive option from 'undrop'. So I think this is ready to merge.
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge,
give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another time, otherwise
just merge it.
For net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake, I've removed
the --recursive option
Am 16.05.10 11:19, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge,
give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another time, otherwise
just merge it.
For
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
Am 16.05.10 11:19, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge,
give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.bizwrote:
* #20447: mtn diff filename fails inside of a renamed directory
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
- @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
Patch looks ok, if you add tests for the
Am 12.05.10 18:26, schrieb Derek Scherger:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.bizwrote:
* #20447: mtn diff filename fails inside of a renamed directory
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
- @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
Derek Scherger de...@echologic.com writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
I think restrictions in general are poorly defined, which is one reason
I never use them.
If you say 'undrop file' you're using them! ;)
Well, yes, that's how
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Derek Scherger de...@echologic.com writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
I think restrictions in general are poorly defined, which is one reason
I never use them.
If you say
Am 10.05.2010 04:52, schrieb Derek Scherger:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
* #20447: mtn diff filename fails inside of a renamed directory
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
- @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
Am 10.05.2010 05:23, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
* #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
merge or disapprove
- branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
- @Tim: is this done?
It needs a test using the
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Here is a little analysis of the recent bugfest efforts.
Thanks for all your work in organizing this.
Point proposals from me are noted for In test issues. If no one else
objects, please close the issues I marked accordingly yourself:
1)
Derek Scherger de...@echologic.com writes:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
* #13604: need 'undelete' ('undrop'?)
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake
- patch looks largely cool, some minor objections:
revert = not undrop; - is
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
It is a minor modification of revert; I factored out the common code.
undrop just tells revert not to revert a file that is present in the
workspace, because it had changes when it was dropped.
Ahh I see.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Here is a little analysis of the recent bugfest efforts.
Thanks for all your work in organizing this.
I'll second that, you've done a great job of keeping
Am 10.05.10 17:03, schrieb Derek Scherger:
One thing I noticed in trying to fix the diff bug was this:
$ mtn mv dir dir2
$ edit dir2/file
$ mth revert dir2/file # only reverts content, leaves directory rename in
place
$ edit dir2/file
$ mtn revert dir2 --depth=0 # should revert the rename
Am 10.05.10 05:23, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
* #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
merge or disapprove
- branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
- @Tim: is this done?
It needs a test using the
Am 10.05.10 17:08, schrieb Derek Scherger:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Here is a little analysis of the recent bugfest efforts.
Thanks for all your work in organizing this.
I'll
Derek Scherger de...@echologic.com writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
It is a minor modification of revert; I factored out the common code.
undrop just tells revert not to revert a file that is present in the
workspace, because it
Hi again!
So I got comments on most things - lets check the final scores:
1) Assigned, but not (yet) closed issues:
* #7221: [NEED TEST] monotone cert should not require its target
be on a branch
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.7221-stephen_leake
- @Stephe: Please look at my
On 05/10/2010 03:44 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 10.05.10 05:23, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
* #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
merge or disapprove
- branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
-
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Leake
stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org wrote:
I don't know; --no-content to me sounds like don't revert content,
just renmaes and other stuff. That's not the same as 'undrop', which
does revert content if the file actually got deleted from the workspace.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
* #20447: mtn diff filename fails inside of a renamed directory
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
- @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
Patch looks ok, if you add tests for the
Hi all!
Here is a little analysis of the recent bugfest efforts. Point proposals
from me are noted for In test issues. If no one else objects, please
close the issues I marked accordingly yourself:
1) Assigned, but not (yet) closed issues:
* #7221: [NEED TEST] monotone cert should not require
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
* #20447: mtn diff filename fails inside of a renamed directory
- net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
- @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
I spent most of the day working on this and made
On 05/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
* #17878: Usability: too easy to accidentally fork after
merge or disapprove
- branch is net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.17878-tbrownaw
- @Tim: is this done?
It needs a test using the --update option, which I'll get to either in
the
26 matches
Mail list logo
